233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31796374)
1. Weighted Gleason Grade Group (WGGG): A new prostate cancer biopsy reporting system with prognostic potential.
Waingankar N; Martini A; Griffiths L; Shah P; Paulucci DJ; Kotamarti S; Gul Z; Elmasri M; Yaskiv O; Haines K; Lerner S; Vira M; Kavoussi LR; Tewari AK; Kapoor DA; Olsson CA
Urol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):78.e15-78.e21. PubMed ID: 31796374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Merriman KM; Harmon SA; Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Blake Z; Lay NS; Phelps TE; Merino MJ; Parnes HL; Law YM; Gurram S; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):773-787. PubMed ID: 37404084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.
Shangguan X; Dong B; Wang Y; Xu F; Shao X; Sha J; Zhu Y; Pan J; Xue W
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 27650933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse pathology and undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: is adjuvant radiation warranted?
Simon RM; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Vidal AC
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 26010251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.
Leong JY; Herrera-Caceres JO; Goldberg H; Tham E; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Fleshner NE; Tilki D; Chandrasekar T
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():102-107. PubMed ID: 31705947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of morphological patterns of Gleason grade 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Franklin A; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Yaxley J; Johannsen S; Gianduzzo T; Ganter J; Pecoraro C; Thunders M; Samaratunga H
Pathology; 2021 Feb; 53(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 33386122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score.
Jambor I; Falagario U; Ratnani P; Perez IM; Demir K; Merisaari H; Sobotka S; Haines GK; Martini A; Beksac AT; Lewis S; Pahikkala T; Wiklund P; Nair S; Tewari A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 31566845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.
Jang WS; Kim LH; Yoon CY; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164497. PubMed ID: 27716842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer-specific survival and predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence and survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.
Secin FP; Bianco FJ; Vickers AJ; Reuter V; Wheeler T; Fearn PA; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2369-75. PubMed ID: 16649221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expansile cribriform Gleason pattern 4 has histopathologic and molecular features of aggressiveness and greater risk of biochemical failure compared to glomerulation Gleason pattern 4.
Greenland NY; Cowan JE; Zhang L; Carroll PR; Chan E; Stohr BA; Simko JP
Prostate; 2020 May; 80(8):653-659. PubMed ID: 32220141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Ristau BT; Tomaszewski JJ; Chen YF; Bertolet M; Woldemichael E; Nelson JB
World J Urol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 25366883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
Sugano D; Sidana A; Jain AL; Calio B; Gaur S; Maruf M; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 31098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seminal vesicle invasion combined with extraprostatic extension is associated with higher frequency of biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis than seminal vesicle invasion alone: Proposal for further pT3 prostate cancer subclassification.
Rehman A; El-Zaatari ZM; Han SH; Shen SS; Ayala AG; Miles B; Divatia MK; Ketcham MS; Chung BM; Rogers JT; Ro JY
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Dec; 49():151611. PubMed ID: 32956915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Dean LW; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Al-Ahmadie HA; Chen YB; Gopalan A; Sirintrapun SJ; Tickoo SK; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Reuter VE; Ehdaie B; Fine SW
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 30076908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
