BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31796778)

  • 1. Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.
    Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Rowlands AV; Henriksson P; Shiroma EJ; Acosta FM; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Plaza-Florido A; Gil-Cosano JJ; Ekelund U; van Hees VT; Ortega FB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18235. PubMed ID: 31796778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
    Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
    Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization.
    Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Tudor-Locke C; Löf M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Molina-Garcia P; Mora-Gonzalez J; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Garcia-Marmol E; Ekelund U; Ortega FB
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moving Forward with Backward Compatibility: Translating Wrist Accelerometer Data.
    Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Fairclough SJ; Boddy LM; Olds TS; Parfitt G; Noonan RJ; Downs SJ; Knowles ZR; Beets MW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Nov; 48(11):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 27327029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
    Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents.
    Fairclough SJ; Rowlands AV; Del Pozo Cruz B; Crotti M; Foweather L; Graves LEF; Hurter L; Jones O; MacDonald M; McCann DA; Miller C; Noonan RJ; Owen MB; Rudd JR; Taylor SL; Tyler R; Boddy LM
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2023 Mar; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 36964597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children.
    Crotti M; Foweather L; Rudd JR; Hurter L; Schwarz S; Boddy LM
    J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 32228156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?
    Rowlands AV; Yates T; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 27183118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist.
    Buchan DS; McSeveney F; McLellan G
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jan; 39(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 30058765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Sedentary Time and Physical Activity from Hip and Non-Dominant and Dominant Wrists in Older Adults.
    Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Alcantara JMA; Leal-Martín J; Mañas A; Ara I; Glynn NW; Shiroma EJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34064790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Activity Index for Raw Accelerometry Data and Its Comparison with Other Activity Metrics.
    Bai J; Di C; Xiao L; Evenson KR; LaCroix AZ; Crainiceanu CM; Buchner DM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160644. PubMed ID: 27513333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing estimates of physical activity in children across different cut-points and the associations with weight status.
    Leppänen MH; Migueles JH; Abdollahi AM; Engberg E; Ortega FB; Roos E
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2022 Jun; 32(6):971-983. PubMed ID: 35253276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerometer Data Processing and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Preschoolers.
    Migueles JH; Delisle Nyström C; Henriksson P; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Ortega FB; Löf M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2019 Mar; 51(3):590-598. PubMed ID: 30303935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity.
    van Hees VT; Gorzelniak L; Dean León EC; Eder M; Pias M; Taherian S; Ekelund U; Renström F; Franks PW; Horsch A; Brage S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61691. PubMed ID: 23626718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement and equivalence of estimated physical activity behaviours, using ENMO- and counts-based processing methods, for wrist-worn accelerometers in adolescents.
    Williams RA; Dring KJ; Morris JG; Sun FH; Cooper SB
    J Sports Sci; 2022 Nov; 40(22):2499-2508. PubMed ID: 36638058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children.
    Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting the Intensity Gradient for Use with Count-Based Accelerometry Data in Children and Adolescents.
    Alexander CJ; Manske SL; Edwards WB; Gabel L
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study.
    Bammann K; Thomson NK; Albrecht BM; Buchan DS; Easton C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252615. PubMed ID: 34081715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of cut-off points for the Move4 accelerometer in children aged 8-13 years.
    Beck F; Marzi I; Eisenreich A; Seemüller S; Tristram C; Reimers AK
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 15(1):163. PubMed ID: 38017586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.