These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3179704)

  • 1. A developmental study of the auditory Stroop effect.
    Jerger S; Martin RC; Pirozzolo FJ
    Brain Lang; 1988 Sep; 35(1):86-104. PubMed ID: 3179704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory stroop effects in children with hearing impairment.
    Jerger S; Stout G; Kent M; Albritton E; Loiselle L; Blondeau R; Jorgenson S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 36(5):1083-96. PubMed ID: 8246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linguistic influences on the auditory processing of speech by children with normal hearing or hearing impairment.
    Jerger S; Elizondo R; Dinh T; Sanchez P; Chavira E
    Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):138-60. PubMed ID: 8020647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graded auditory Stroop effects generated by gender words.
    Gregg MK; Purdy KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):549-55. PubMed ID: 18065077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory interference control in children with learning disability: An exploratory study.
    Thomas RM; Kaipa R; Ganesh AC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2079-85. PubMed ID: 26432540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.
    Morgan AL; Brandt JF
    Brain Lang; 1989 May; 36(4):592-603. PubMed ID: 2720372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiologic indices of Stroop and Garner interference reveal linguistic influences on auditory and visual processing.
    Lew H; Chmiel R; Jerger J; Pomerantz JR; Jerger S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Apr; 8(2):104-18. PubMed ID: 9101457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Stroop tasks can tell us about selective attention from childhood to adulthood.
    Wright BC
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 108(3):583-607. PubMed ID: 27786354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time-course of the cross-modal semantic modulation of visual picture processing by naturalistic sounds and spoken words.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 24319929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults.
    Wurm LH; Labouvie-Vief G; Aycock J; Rebucal KA; Koch HE
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 15383002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Developmental Perspective on Processing Semantic Context: Preliminary Evidence from Sentential Auditory Word Repetition in School-Aged Children.
    Mahler NA; Chenery HJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Feb; 48(1):81-105. PubMed ID: 29992391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1554-68. PubMed ID: 21688942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental trends in the interaction between auditory and linguistic processing.
    Jerger S; Pirozzolo F; Jerger J; Elizondo R; Desai S; Wright E; Reynosa R
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 8414890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of semantically congruent and incongruent visual information on auditory object recognition across development.
    Thomas RL; Nardini M; Mareschal D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Oct; 162():72-88. PubMed ID: 28595113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components.
    Ferrand L; Ducrot S; Chausse P; Maïonchi-Pino N; O'Connor RJ; Parris BA; Perret P; Riggs KJ; Augustinova M
    Dev Sci; 2020 Mar; 23(2):e12899. PubMed ID: 31483912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of auditory presentation of words on color naming: the intermodal Stroop effect.
    Shimada H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1155-61. PubMed ID: 2399091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.