These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797259)

  • 1. Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31797259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to suppress a location is configuration-dependent.
    Gao Y; de Waard J; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2170-2177. PubMed ID: 37258893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.
    Won BY; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):787-806. PubMed ID: 25401460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
    Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
    Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.