215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797368)
1. Estimating average treatment effects with a double-index propensity score.
Cheng D; Chakrabortty A; Ananthakrishnan AN; Cai T
Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):767-777. PubMed ID: 31797368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust and efficient semi-supervised estimation of average treatment effects with application to electronic health records data.
Cheng D; Ananthakrishnan AN; Cai T
Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):413-423. PubMed ID: 32413171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.
Liu J; Ma Y; Wang L
Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):910-923. PubMed ID: 29441521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.
Xu J; Wei K; Wang C; Huang C; Xue Y; Zhang R; Qin G; Yu Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 36577950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variance reduction in the inverse probability weighted estimators for the average treatment effect using the propensity score.
Liao J; Rohde C
Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):660-667. PubMed ID: 33715153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.
Shortreed SM; Ertefaie A
Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 28273693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.
Kostouraki A; Hajage D; Rachet B; Williamson EJ; Chauvet G; Belot A; Leyrat C
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2672-2694. PubMed ID: 38622063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of propensity score methods for causal inference with high-dimensional covariates.
Gao Q; Zhang Y; Sun H; Wang T
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jul; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35667004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
Hattori S; Henmi M
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model averaged double robust estimation.
Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doubly robust estimation and sensitivity analysis for marginal structural quantile models.
Cheng C; Hu L; Li F
Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38884127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust best linear weighted estimator with missing covariates in survival analysis.
Wang CY; Hsu L; Harrison T
Stat Med; 2024 Apr; 43(9):1790-1803. PubMed ID: 38402690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An improved multiply robust estimator for the average treatment effect.
Wang C; Wei K; Huang C; Yu Y; Qin G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):231. PubMed ID: 37821829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
