312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797438)
1. Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.
Li F
Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):438-455. PubMed ID: 31797438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Li F; Turner EL; Preisser JS
Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 29921006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Toles M; Li F
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Jan; 32(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 36253078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Chen J; Zhou X; Li F; Spiegelman D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106522. PubMed ID: 34818620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Scott JM; deCamp A; Juraska M; Fay MP; Gilbert PB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):583-597. PubMed ID: 25267551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hybrid approach to comparing parallel-group and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with a continuous primary outcome when there is uncertainty in the intra-cluster correlation.
Sarkodie SK; Wason JM; Grayling MJ
Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 20(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 36086822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.
Kasza J; Hemming K; Hooper R; Matthews J; Forbes AB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):703-716. PubMed ID: 29027505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.
Li F; Forbes AB; Turner EL; Preisser JS
Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):636-649. PubMed ID: 30298551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.
Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Li F; Turner EL; Toles M; Rathouz PJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107362. PubMed ID: 36709555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.
Taljaard M; Teerenstra S; Ivers NM; Fergusson DA
Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 26940696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.
Harrison LJ; Wang R
Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6674-6688. PubMed ID: 34558112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering.
Teerenstra S; Taljaard M; Haenen A; Huis A; Atsma F; Rodwell L; Hulscher M
Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):225-236. PubMed ID: 31018678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving efficiency in the stepped-wedge trial design via Bayesian modeling with an informative prior for the time effects.
Zhan D; Ouyang Y; Xu L; Wong H
Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 18(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 33813906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.
Nevins P; Ryan M; Davis-Plourde K; Ouyang Y; Pereira Macedo JA; Meng C; Tong G; Wang X; Ortiz-Reyes L; Caille A; Li F; Taljaard M
Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 37990575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials.
Woertman W; de Hoop E; Moerbeek M; Zuidema SU; Gerritsen DL; Teerenstra S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):752-8. PubMed ID: 23523551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power calculation for detecting interaction effect in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an important tool for disparity research.
Yang C; Berkalieva A; Mazumdar M; Kwon D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38431550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
