These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797449)

  • 1. Risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining: The roles of prosecutors and defense attorneys.
    Monahan J; Metz A; Garrett BL; Jakubow A
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31797449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Siebert L; Garrett B
    J Community Psychol; 2020 Aug; 48(6):2053-2068. PubMed ID: 32667056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk and resources: A qualitative perspective on low-level sentencing in Virginia.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Garrett B; Siebert L
    J Community Psychol; 2019 Jul; 47(6):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 31090080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
    Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey regarding the 0.05 blood alcohol concentration limit for driving in the United States.
    Fiorentino DD; Martin BD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 May; 19(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 29333873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: does zealous representation apply equally to all?
    Edkins VA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 21103915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
    Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
    Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
    Miller MK; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference.
    Kramer GM; Wolbransky M; Heilbrun K
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 17486632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attorneys' experiences, perceptions, and plea recommendations in child sexual abuse cases.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD; Aronson E; McWilliams K
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 38573702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental Illness and Mental Health Defenses: Perceptions of the Criminal Bar.
    Frierson RL; Boyd MS; Harper A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Dec; 43(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26668226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations: A preliminary exploration of public defenders.
    Metcalfe C
    Behav Sci Law; 2021 Jun; 39(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 34031905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of question repetition on responses when prosecutors and defense attorneys question children alleging sexual abuse in court.
    Andrews SJ; Lamb ME; Lyon TD
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):559-70. PubMed ID: 26237333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judicial appraisals of risk assessment in sentencing.
    Monahan J; Metz AL; Garrett BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):565-575. PubMed ID: 30306621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.