These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797564)

  • 61. Identifying a better strategy for ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with anticipated unfavorable radial access: the Little Women study.
    Sgueglia GA; Todaro D; De Santis A; Conte M; Gioffrè G; Di Giorgio A; D'Errico F; Piccioni F; Summaria F; Gaspardone A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jun; 19(4):413-417. PubMed ID: 29113865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cerebral Infarcts After Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Propensity-Score-Adjusted Comparison of Right Radial, Left Radial, and Femoral Approaches.
    Marchese N; Copetti M; Inchingolo V; Popolizio T; Fontana A; Simeone A; Vigna C
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jul; 21(7):882-887. PubMed ID: 31761638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
    Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.
    Hibbert B; Simard T; Wilson KR; Hawken S; Wells GA; Ramirez FD; Le May MR; So DY; Glover CA; Froeschl M; Marquis JF; Labinaz M; Dick A; O'Brien ER
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 22917453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
    Koutouzis M; Matejka G; Olivecrona G; Grip L; Albertsson P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 20347796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Heparin use for diagnostic cardiac catheterization with a radial artery approach: An international survey of practice patterns.
    Bossard M; Lavi S; Rao SV; Cohen DJ; Cantor WJ; Bainey KR; Valettas N; Jolly SS; Mehta SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):854-859. PubMed ID: 29405556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
    Sandoval Y; Burke MN; Lobo AS; Lips DL; Seto AH; Chavez I; Sorajja P; Abu-Fadel MS; Wang Y; Poulouse A; Gössl M; Mooney M; Traverse J; Tierney D; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2233-2241. PubMed ID: 29169493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Targeting transradial approach.
    Giustino G; Cota L; Chieffo A
    Panminerva Med; 2015 Mar; 57(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 25373398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.
    Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Aranzulla TC; Russo F; Latib A; Burzotta F; Agostoni P; Ielasi A; Tarantino F; Sticchi A; Di Palma G; de Benedictis M; Trani C; Boccaletti R; Miccoli R; Valsecchi O; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 28463463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Radial PCI and the obesity paradox: Insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2).
    McDonagh JR; Seth M; LaLonde TA; Khandewal AK; Wohns DH; Dixon SR; Gurm HS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 26010906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The Learning Curves for Transradial and Ultrasound-Guided Arterial Access: An Analysis of the SURF Trial.
    Jayanti S; Juergens C; Makris A; Hennessy A; Nguyen P
    Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Sep; 30(9):1329-1336. PubMed ID: 33722490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Standard versus ultrasound-guided radial and femoral access in coronary angiography and intervention (SURF): a randomised controlled trial.
    Nguyen P; Makris A; Hennessy A; Jayanti S; Wang A; Park K; Chen V; Nguyen T; Lo S; Xuan W; Leung M; Juergens C
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Aug; 15(6):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 31113763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Retrospective analysis of coronary interventions in a single centre and comparison of specific differences between radial and femoral access.
    Rychlik J; Hornacek I; Tejc M; Petrikovits E; Klimsa Z
    Acta Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 30193077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis.
    Aoi S; Htun WW; Freeo S; Lee S; Kyaw H; Alfaro V; Coppola J; Pancholy S; Kwan T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 94(5):651-657. PubMed ID: 30801939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Recanalization of the occluded radial artery via distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.
    Li F; Shi GW; Zhang BF; Yu XL; Huang HM; Xiao JQ; Cai GJ
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Feb; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33530954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fernandez R; Zaky F; Ekmejian A; Curtis E; Lee A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 29388387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: A systematic scoping review.
    Coomes EA; Haghbayan H; Cheema AN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 31785083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.