162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797716)
1. Improved patient-reported functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy by using NeuroSAFE technique.
Fosså SD; Beyer B; Dahl AA; Aas K; Eri LM; Kvan E; Falk RS; Graefen M; Huland H; Berge V
Scand J Urol; 2019 Dec; 53(6):385-391. PubMed ID: 31797716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.
van der Slot MA; Remmers S; van Leenders GJLH; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; den Bakker MA; Kweldam CF; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; Venderbos LDF;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Sep; 9(5):824-831. PubMed ID: 37032279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study.
Avulova S; Zhao Z; Lee D; Huang LC; Koyama T; Hoffman KE; Conwill RM; Wu XC; Chen V; Cooperberg MR; Goodman M; Greenfield S; Hamilton AS; Hashibe M; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Resnick MJ; Penson DF; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1202-1209. PubMed ID: 29253578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Harris CR; Punnen S; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):981-6. PubMed ID: 23410984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.
Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Seitz M; Becker AJ; Buchner A; Trittschler S; Stief CG
World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 24752607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.
Dinneen E; Haider A; Allen C; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Brew-Graves C; Grierson J; Williams NR; Persad R; Oakley N; Adshead JM; Huland H; Haese A; Shaw G
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e028132. PubMed ID: 31189680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.
Michl U; Tennstedt P; Feldmeier L; Mandel P; Oh SJ; Ahyai S; Budäus L; Chun FKH; Haese A; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 26277303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Beyer B; Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Boehm K; Adam M; Schiffmann J; Sauter G; Wittmer C; Steuber T; Graefen M; Huland H; Haese A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 24411279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Becker A; Coelius C; Adam M; Tennstedt P; Kluth L; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Schlomm T; Michl U
World J Urol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24668119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional Outcomes Following Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy Augmented with Seminal Vesicle Sparing Compared to Standard Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gilbert SM; Dunn RL; Miller DC; Montgomery JS; Skolarus TA; Weizer AZ; Wood DP; Hollenbeck BK
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):600-607. PubMed ID: 28392393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional outcome after radical prostatectomy in 1313 patients: A single-center study.
Haeuser L; Tully KH; Reicherz A; Berg S; Moritz R; Roghmann F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1290-1297. PubMed ID: 37350456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Nguyen LN; Head L; Witiuk K; Punjani N; Mallick R; Cnossen S; Fergusson DA; Cagiannos I; Lavallée LT; Morash C; Breau RH
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):760-769. PubMed ID: 28286069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE).
van der Slot MA; den Bakker MA; Klaver S; Kliffen M; Busstra MB; Rietbergen JBW; Gan M; Hamoen KE; Budel LM; Goemaere NNT; Bangma CH; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2020 Oct; 77(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 32557744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
