238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31797849)
1. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique.
Sayed ME; Sayed ME; Al-Makramani BM; Al-Sanabani FA; Mohamed MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):734-739. PubMed ID: 27733716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Combinations of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material: An
Mahagaonkar PA; Angadi PB; Naik NR; Kakatkar V; Manjunath SH; Sonawane YS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 32381826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty/wash impression technique.
Richards MW; Zeiaei S; Bagby MD; Okubo S; Soltani J
J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 7(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 10196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
Nissan J; Rosner O; Bukhari MA; Ghelfan O; Pilo R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
