These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3179795)
1. A new porcine bioprosthesis: design rationale and early clinical experience. Lemieux M; Dumesnil JG; Dowd C; Lutz D; Cartier P; Desaulniers D; Despres JP; Metras J; Raymond G Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 3179795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The zero pressure fixed medtronic intact porcine valve: an 8.5 year review. Barratt-Boyes BG; Jaffe WM; Ko PH; Whitlock RM J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 8269174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asynchronous primary valve failure in patients with porcine bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves. Magilligan DJ; Kemp SR; Stein PD; Peterson E Circulation; 1987 Sep; 76(3 Pt 2):III141-5. PubMed ID: 3621539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis. Kirsch ME; Tzvetkov B; Vermes E; Pouzet B; Sauvat S; Loisance D J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 15974539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses. Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A single center experience with the freestyle bioprosthesis: midterm results at the Québec Heart Institute. Dagenais F; Cartier P; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Lemieux M; Raymond G; Desaulniers D; Perron J; Bauset R; Baillot R; Doyle D Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):156-62. PubMed ID: 11805965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves. Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can early thromboembolic complications after valve replacement be avoided? Kure HH; Schüller H; Thulin L; Olin C Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():302-4. PubMed ID: 3727707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]