These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve in the aortic position: 100 months clinical experience. Revuelta JM; Durán CM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 2429393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and biological prosthetic valves after isolated valve replacement--cooperative study on total 1281 patients]. Nakano S; Kawashima Y; Komatsu S; Sakai K; Eguchi S; Aosaki M; Misaki T; Ohara K; Tokunaga K Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 2671191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience. Joyce LD; Nelson RM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Results in 117 patients with 17 and 19 mm valves. Bojar RM; Diehl JT; Moten M; Payne DD; Rastegar H; Stetz JJ; Pandian NG; Cleveland RJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Dec; 98(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 2586125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]