413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3179796)
1. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bedard JP; Brais MP; Goldstein WG; Koshal A; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 1986173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
Kawachi Y; Tanaka J; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow-up of the Ionescu-Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Tindel N; Factor SM; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):758-63. PubMed ID: 6492841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve in the aortic position: 100 months clinical experience.
Revuelta JM; Durán CM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 2429393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and biological prosthetic valves after isolated valve replacement--cooperative study on total 1281 patients].
Nakano S; Kawashima Y; Komatsu S; Sakai K; Eguchi S; Aosaki M; Misaki T; Ohara K; Tokunaga K
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 2671191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
Joyce LD; Nelson RM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Results in 117 patients with 17 and 19 mm valves.
Bojar RM; Diehl JT; Moten M; Payne DD; Rastegar H; Stetz JJ; Pandian NG; Cleveland RJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Dec; 98(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 2586125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves--a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses.
Reichenspurner H; Weinhold C; Nollert G; Kaulbach HG; Vetter HO; Boehm DH; Reichart B
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 43(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7540324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis. A preliminary report.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Santini F; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Mar; 97(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 2918737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Midpoint follow-up results of aortic valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Apropos of 109 patients].
Michel PL; Kassab R; Vahanian A; Belkaid M; Acar J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Jun; 79(7):1046-51. PubMed ID: 3096227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
