413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3179796)
21. The Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis. Analysis of long-term evolution.
Alvarez L; Escudero C; Figuera D; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Nov; 104(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 1434701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcomes with the Hancock II bioprosthetic valve.
Masters RG; Haddad M; Pipe AL; Veinot JP; Mesana T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Sep; 78(3):832-6. PubMed ID: 15337001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-year clinical results with the Monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D; Lindblom U; Henze A; Björk VO; Semb BK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 3600006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Gerein AN; Janusz MT; Tyers GF; Allen P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):652-66. PubMed ID: 3172812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; Cohn LA; Austin JC; Sabik J; DiSesa VJ; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 90(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 4068737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Ionescu-Shiley valve: a solution for the small aortic root.
Revuelta JM; Garcia-Rinaldi R; Johnston RH; Bonnington L; Ubago JL; Duran CG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 6748717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mitral valve replacement with Hancock porcine bioprostheses: up to 7-year follow-up.
Brais MP; Bédard JP; Goldstein W; Koshal A; Keon WJ
Can J Surg; 1985 Mar; 28(2):119-21, 123. PubMed ID: 3971234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patterns of failure in Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.
Walley VM; Rubens FD; Campagna M; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Aug; 102(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 1865694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term clinical results after mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Feb; 95(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3339899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Strut fracture and other events after valve replacement with the 60 degree convexoconcave Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Gonzalez-Lavin L; McGrath LB; Grunkemeier G; Fernandez J; Lewis B; Quinlan W
Circulation; 1987 Sep; 76(3 Pt 2):III137-40. PubMed ID: 3621537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
