226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31798017)
1. Physiological parameters analysis of transfemoral amputees with different prosthetic knees.
Li S; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 31798017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees.
Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Klute GK; McDowell ML; Pecoraro JA; Shofer J; Czerniecki JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(7):857-70. PubMed ID: 17436172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Fuenzalida Squella SA; Kannenberg A; Brandão Benetti Â
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 28691574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gait efficiency using the C-Leg.
Orendurff MS; Segal AD; Klute GK; McDowell ML; Pecoraro JA; Czerniecki JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 16847790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee across varying walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Sveinsdóttir HS; Prins MR; van der Meer F; Koopman HFJM; Rietman JS
Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():254-260. PubMed ID: 27838569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foot trajectories and loading rates in a transfemoral amputee for six different commercial prosthetic knees: An indication of adaptability.
Abouhossein A; Awad MI; Maqbool HF; Crisp C; Stewart TD; Messenger N; Richardson RC; Dehghani-Sanij AA; Bradley D
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jun; 68():46-56. PubMed ID: 30979583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot study of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee with a novel hydraulic damper.
Zhang Y; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 31476188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1380-5. PubMed ID: 18586142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of walking speed and prosthetic knee control type on external mechanical work in transfemoral prosthesis users.
Pinhey SR; Murata H; Hisano G; Ichimura D; Hobara H; Major MJ
J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 134():110984. PubMed ID: 35182901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; Iverson BK; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 17869114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobility function of a prosthetic knee joint with an automatic stance phase lock.
Andrysek J; Klejman S; Torres-Moreno R; Heim W; Steinnagel B; Glasford S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 21697198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfemoral amputee intact limb loading and compensatory gait mechanics during down slope ambulation and the effect of prosthetic knee mechanisms.
Morgenroth DC; Roland M; Pruziner AL; Czerniecki JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():65-72. PubMed ID: 29698851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-individual biomechanical effects of a non-microprocessor-controlled stance-yielding prosthetic knee during ramp descent in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Mita T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30051754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices.
Johansson JL; Sherrill DM; Riley PO; Bonato P; Herr H
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Aug; 84(8):563-75. PubMed ID: 16034225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
