These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31799076)
1. Evaluation of performance of leading algorithms for variant pathogenicity predictions and designing a combinatory predictor method: application to Rett syndrome variants. Ganakammal SR; Alexov E PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8106. PubMed ID: 31799076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Ensemble Approach to Predict the Pathogenicity of Synonymous Variants. Ranganathan Ganakammal S; Alexov E Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32967157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene-specific machine learning model to predict the pathogenicity of Khandakji MN; Mifsud B Front Genet; 2022; 13():982930. PubMed ID: 36246618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning-based reclassification of germline variants of unknown significance: The RENOVO algorithm. Favalli V; Tini G; Bonetti E; Vozza G; Guida A; Gandini S; Pelicci PG; Mazzarella L Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Apr; 108(4):682-695. PubMed ID: 33761318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Good performance of the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology in prediction of pathogenicity of genetic variants causing thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Ponińska JK; Bilińska ZT; Truszkowska G; Michalak E; Podgórska A; Stępień-Wojno M; Chmielewski P; Lutyńska A; Płoski R J Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 35078481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Type IV Collagen Variants in CKD: Performance of Computational Predictions for Identifying Pathogenic Variants. Shulman C; Liang E; Kamura M; Udwan K; Yao T; Cattran D; Reich H; Hladunewich M; Pei Y; Savige J; Paterson AD; Suico MA; Kai H; Barua M Kidney Med; 2021; 3(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 33851121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodal framework to resolve variants of uncertain significance in Biar CG; Pfeifer C; Carvill GL; Calhoun JD bioRxiv; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of in silico pathogenicity prediction tools for the classification of small in-frame indels. Cannon S; Williams M; Gunning AC; Wright CF BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Feb; 16(1):36. PubMed ID: 36855133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches. Guidugli L; Shimelis H; Masica DL; Pankratz VS; Lipton GB; Singh N; Hu C; Monteiro ANA; Lindor NM; Goldgar DE; Karchin R; Iversen ES; Couch FJ Am J Hum Genet; 2018 Feb; 102(2):233-248. PubMed ID: 29394989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AmazonForest: In Silico Metaprediction of Pathogenic Variants. Palheta HGA; Gonçalves WG; Brito LM; Dos Santos AR; Dos Reis Matsumoto M; Ribeiro-Dos-Santos Â; de Araújo GS Biology (Basel); 2022 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 35453737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines. Ghosh R; Oak N; Plon SE Genome Biol; 2017 Nov; 18(1):225. PubMed ID: 29179779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of missense variants in the human genome reveals widespread gene-specific clustering and improves prediction of pathogenicity. Quinodoz M; Peter VG; Cisarova K; Royer-Bertrand B; Stenson PD; Cooper DN; Unger S; Superti-Furga A; Rivolta C Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Mar; 109(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 35120630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendations by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like expert panel for gene-specific variant interpretation methods. McKnight D; Bean L; Karbassi I; Beattie K; Bienvenu T; Bonin H; Fang P; Chrisodoulou J; Friez M; Helgeson M; Krishnaraj R; Meng L; Mighion L; Neul J; Percy A; Ramsden S; Zoghbi H; Das S Hum Mutat; 2022 Aug; 43(8):1097-1113. PubMed ID: 34837432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-silico Analysis of Accetturo M; Bartolomeo N; Stella A Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 31979111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification. Tian Y; Pesaran T; Chamberlin A; Fenwick RB; Li S; Gau CL; Chao EC; Lu HM; Black MH; Qian D Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):12752. PubMed ID: 31484976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinterpretation of common pathogenic variants in ClinVar revealed a high proportion of downgrades. Xiang J; Yang J; Chen L; Chen Q; Yang H; Sun C; Zhou Q; Peng Z Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):331. PubMed ID: 31942019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Rett syndrome: report of a new pathogenic variant and review of the literature regarding two clinical cases.]. Jara-Ettinger AC; Suárez-Hortiales S; Torre-García O Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 2021; 78(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 34351885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A catalogue of 863 Rett-syndrome-causing MECP2 mutations and lessons learned from data integration. Ehrhart F; Jacobsen A; Rigau M; Bosio M; Kaliyaperumal R; Laros JFJ; Willighagen EL; Valencia A; Roos M; Capella-Gutierrez S; Curfs LMG; Evelo CT Sci Data; 2021 Jan; 8(1):10. PubMed ID: 33452270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis. Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curated multiple sequence alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene and accuracy of in silico pathogenicity predictions. Karabachev AD; Martini DJ; Hermel DJ; Solcz D; Richardson ME; Pesaran T; Sarkar IN; Greenblatt MS PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0233673. PubMed ID: 32750050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]