309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31799093)
1. Does Google™ Have the Answers? The Internet-based Information on Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures.
Murphy EP; Fenelon C; Murphy F; Baig MN; Murphy RP; Diack M; Leonard M
Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5952. PubMed ID: 31799093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.
Raj S; Sharma VL; Singh AJ; Goel S
Adv Prev Med; 2016; 2016():4815285. PubMed ID: 27119025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison.
Murray KE; Murray TE; O'Rourke AC; Low C; Veale DJ
Interact J Med Res; 2019 Sep; 8(3):e12855. PubMed ID: 31538953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of Patient-Centered eHealth Information on Erosive Tooth Wear: Systematic Search and Evaluation of Websites and YouTube Videos.
Holland L; Kanzow AF; Wiegand A; Kanzow P
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jan; 26():e49514. PubMed ID: 38167299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
