204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31799859)
1. Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Chen M; Yepes P; Hojo Y; Poenisch F; Li Y; Chen J; Xu C; He X; Gunn GB; Frank SJ; Sahoo N; Li H; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190669. PubMed ID: 31799859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.
Aitkenhead AH; Sitch P; Richardson JC; Winterhalter C; Patel I; Mackay RI
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200228. PubMed ID: 32726141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities.
Botnariuc D; Court S; Lourenço A; Gosling A; Royle G; Hussein M; Rompokos V; Veiga C
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38052092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional gamma criterion for patient-specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams.
Chang C; Poole KL; Teran AV; Luckman S; Mah D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):381–388. PubMed ID: 26699329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A noise correction of the γ-index method for Monte Carlo dose distribution comparison.
Cohilis M; Sterpin E; Lee JA; Souris K
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):681-692. PubMed ID: 31660623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of fast intensity-modulated proton therapy dose prediction method using deep neural networks for prostate cancer.
Wang W; Chang Y; Liu Y; Liang Z; Liao Y; Qin B; Liu X; Yang Z
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5451-5463. PubMed ID: 35543109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid 3D analytical linear energy transfer calculation algorithm based on precalculated data from Monte Carlo simulations.
Deng W; Ding X; Younkin JE; Shen J; Bues M; Schild SE; Patel SH; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):745-752. PubMed ID: 31758864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FRoG dose computation meets Monte Carlo accuracy for proton therapy dose calculation in lung.
Magro G; Mein S; Kopp B; Mastella E; Pella A; Ciocca M; Mairani A
Phys Med; 2021 Jun; 86():66-74. PubMed ID: 34058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Deng W; Younkin JE; Souris K; Huang S; Augustine K; Fatyga M; Ding X; Cohilis M; Bues M; Shan J; Stoker J; Lin L; Shen J; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2558-2574. PubMed ID: 32153029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom.
Pan Y; Yang R; Li J; Zhang X; Liu L; Wang J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):142-148. PubMed ID: 29603564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
