270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31799870)
1. Quantitative Analysis of Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: A Pilot Study of Preoperative Prediction of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Tang Z; Yu D; Ni T; Zhao T; Jin Y; Dong E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):370-382. PubMed ID: 31799870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiomics of small renal masses on multiphasic CT: accuracy of machine learning-based classification models for the differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.
Yang R; Wu J; Sun L; Lai S; Xu Y; Liu X; Ma Y; Zhen X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 31468159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand-crafted feature concatenation.
Lee H; Hong H; Kim J; Jung DC
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29474742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of quantitative CT texture analysis in differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma on four-phase contrast-enhanced CT images.
You MW; Kim N; Choi HJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 Jul; 74(7):547-554. PubMed ID: 31010583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
Hodgdon T; McInnes MD; Schieda N; Flood TA; Lamb L; Thornhill RE
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 25906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma.
Feng Z; Rong P; Cao P; Zhou Q; Zhu W; Yan Z; Liu Q; Wang W
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29134348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-Enhanced CT Texture Analysis for Distinguishing Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma From Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Yang G; Gong A; Nie P; Yan L; Miao W; Zhao Y; Wu J; Cui J; Jia Y; Wang Z
Mol Imaging; 2019; 18():1536012119883161. PubMed ID: 31625454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphologic analysis with computed tomography may help differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 602 patients.
Kim YH; Han K; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Park SY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):647-654. PubMed ID: 28677004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using specific region of interest on contrast-enhanced CT: a new combination of quantitative tools.
Wang X; Song G; Jiang H
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jul; 21(1):47. PubMed ID: 34225784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Nie P; Yang G; Wang Z; Yan L; Miao W; Hao D; Wu J; Zhao Y; Gong A; Cui J; Jia Y; Niu H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 31506816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated classification of solid renal masses on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using convolutional neural network with decision fusion.
Zabihollahy F; Schieda N; Krishna S; Ukwatta E
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5183-5190. PubMed ID: 32350661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
