220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31800863)
1. Adhesiveness of bulk-fill composite resin in permanent molars submitted to Streptococcus mutans biofilm.
Fidalgo TKDS; Americano G; Medina D; Athayde G; Letieri ADS; Maia LC
Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e111. PubMed ID: 31800863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations.
Shim JS; Li CY; Won JE; Ryu JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):764.e1-764.e7. PubMed ID: 36309470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of Class I and II Composite Resin Restorations Using a Sonic-resin Placement System.
Kalmowicz J; Phebus JG; Owens BM; Johnson WW; King GT
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 26237636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):631-641. PubMed ID: 29630486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.
Braga S; Oliveira L; Rodrigues RB; Bicalho AA; Novais VR; Armstrong S; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28976839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
