These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31801145)
1. Factors Influencing Medical Students' Experiences and Satisfaction with Blended Integrated E-Learning. Venkatesh S; Rao YK; Nagaraja H; Woolley T; Alele FO; Malau-Aduli BS Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 31801145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Education in focus: Significant improvements in student learning and satisfaction with ophthalmology teaching delivered using a blended learning approach. Doyle AJ; Murphy CC; Boland F; Pawlikowska T; Ní Gabhann-Dromgoole J PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0305755. PubMed ID: 38950050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blended learning in basic medical laboratory courses improves medical students' abilities in self-learning, understanding, and problem solving. Chen J; Zhou J; Wang Y; Qi G; Xia C; Mo G; Zhang Z Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Mar; 44(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 31821032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? Morton CE; Saleh SN; Smith SF; Hemani A; Ameen A; Bennie TD; Toro-Troconis M BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16():195. PubMed ID: 27492157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students' experiences and attitudes. Gormley GJ; Collins K; Boohan M; Bickle IC; Stevenson M Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e6-12. PubMed ID: 19253150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia? Sajid MR; Laheji AF; Abothenain F; Salam Y; AlJayar D; Obeidat A Int J Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 7():281-5. PubMed ID: 27591930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Content Delivery Style on Student Performance in Anatomy. White LJ; McGowan HW; McDonald AC Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 29648679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting medical students' satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey. Çakmakkaya ÖS; Meydanlı EG; Kafadar AM; Demirci MS; Süzer Ö; Ar MC; Yaman MO; Demirbaş KC; Gönen MS BMC Med Educ; 2024 Jan; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 38172870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface and deep learning: a blended learning approach in preclinical years of medical school. Khong ML; Tanner JA BMC Med Educ; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1029. PubMed ID: 39300458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High efficacy and students' satisfaction after voluntary vs mandatory use of an e-learning program in traumatology and orthopedics--a follow-up study. Back DA; Haberstroh N; Sostmann K; Schmidmaier G; Putzier M; Perka C; Hoff E J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 24797851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between medical students' prior experiences and perceptions of formal online education developed in response to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China. Wang C; Xie A; Wang W; Wu H BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e041886. PubMed ID: 33122327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Shorey S; Kowitlawakul Y; Devi MK; Chen HC; Soong SKA; Ang E Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():120-126. PubMed ID: 29197264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Student perceptions of online and in-person microbiology laboratory experiences in undergraduate medical education. Brockman RM; Taylor JM; Segars LW; Selke V; Taylor TAH Med Educ Online; 2020 Dec; 25(1):1710324. PubMed ID: 31928152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Blended Learning Educational Format for Third-Year Pediatrics Clinical Rotation. Langenau EE; Lee R; Fults M J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2017 Apr; 117(4):234-243. PubMed ID: 28346604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy. Choi-Lundberg DL; Low TF; Patman P; Turner P; Sinha SN Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26033851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation. Woodham LA; Round J; Stenfors T; Bujacz A; Karlgren K; Jivram T; Riklefs V; Poulton E; Poulton T PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215597. PubMed ID: 31013295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Shaffer K; Small JE Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):1059-70. PubMed ID: 15350588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impacts of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese medical undergraduate students: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies. Li S; Wei W; Li X; Ma L; Li Q; Sun X; Chen X BMC Med Educ; 2024 Aug; 24(1):914. PubMed ID: 39180016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Blended Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students. Maloney S; Nicklen P; Rivers G; Foo J; Ooi YY; Reeves S; Walsh K; Ilic D J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):e182. PubMed ID: 26197801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical students' satisfaction with and engagement in laboratory e-learning support are related to their self-regulation. Moelans CB; Geerling JJ; Radersma RD; Moons MJ; van Diest PJ; van der Schaaf MF Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(3):262-275. PubMed ID: 38270246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]