276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31801145)
1. Factors Influencing Medical Students' Experiences and Satisfaction with Blended Integrated E-Learning.
Venkatesh S; Rao YK; Nagaraja H; Woolley T; Alele FO; Malau-Aduli BS
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 31801145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Education in focus: Significant improvements in student learning and satisfaction with ophthalmology teaching delivered using a blended learning approach.
Doyle AJ; Murphy CC; Boland F; Pawlikowska T; Ní Gabhann-Dromgoole J
PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0305755. PubMed ID: 38950050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blended learning in basic medical laboratory courses improves medical students' abilities in self-learning, understanding, and problem solving.
Chen J; Zhou J; Wang Y; Qi G; Xia C; Mo G; Zhang Z
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Mar; 44(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 31821032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?
Morton CE; Saleh SN; Smith SF; Hemani A; Ameen A; Bennie TD; Toro-Troconis M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16():195. PubMed ID: 27492157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students' experiences and attitudes.
Gormley GJ; Collins K; Boohan M; Bickle IC; Stevenson M
Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e6-12. PubMed ID: 19253150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia?
Sajid MR; Laheji AF; Abothenain F; Salam Y; AlJayar D; Obeidat A
Int J Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 7():281-5. PubMed ID: 27591930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Content Delivery Style on Student Performance in Anatomy.
White LJ; McGowan HW; McDonald AC
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 29648679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting medical students' satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey.
Çakmakkaya ÖS; Meydanlı EG; Kafadar AM; Demirci MS; Süzer Ö; Ar MC; Yaman MO; Demirbaş KC; Gönen MS
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Jan; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 38172870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High efficacy and students' satisfaction after voluntary vs mandatory use of an e-learning program in traumatology and orthopedics--a follow-up study.
Back DA; Haberstroh N; Sostmann K; Schmidmaier G; Putzier M; Perka C; Hoff E
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 24797851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between medical students' prior experiences and perceptions of formal online education developed in response to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China.
Wang C; Xie A; Wang W; Wu H
BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e041886. PubMed ID: 33122327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.
Shorey S; Kowitlawakul Y; Devi MK; Chen HC; Soong SKA; Ang E
Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():120-126. PubMed ID: 29197264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Student perceptions of online and in-person microbiology laboratory experiences in undergraduate medical education.
Brockman RM; Taylor JM; Segars LW; Selke V; Taylor TAH
Med Educ Online; 2020 Dec; 25(1):1710324. PubMed ID: 31928152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Blended Learning Educational Format for Third-Year Pediatrics Clinical Rotation.
Langenau EE; Lee R; Fults M
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2017 Apr; 117(4):234-243. PubMed ID: 28346604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Low TF; Patman P; Turner P; Sinha SN
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26033851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.
Woodham LA; Round J; Stenfors T; Bujacz A; Karlgren K; Jivram T; Riklefs V; Poulton E; Poulton T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215597. PubMed ID: 31013295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy.
Shaffer K; Small JE
Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):1059-70. PubMed ID: 15350588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Blended Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students.
Maloney S; Nicklen P; Rivers G; Foo J; Ooi YY; Reeves S; Walsh K; Ilic D
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):e182. PubMed ID: 26197801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomedical students' satisfaction with and engagement in laboratory e-learning support are related to their self-regulation.
Moelans CB; Geerling JJ; Radersma RD; Moons MJ; van Diest PJ; van der Schaaf MF
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(3):262-275. PubMed ID: 38270246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paper-based versus digital-based learning among undergraduate medical, nursing and pharmaceutical students in Japan: a cross-sectional study.
Yamada M; Sekine M; Tatsuse T
BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e083344. PubMed ID: 38802276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive Style and Mobile E-Learning in Emergent Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Disorders for Millennial Undergraduate Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lee LA; Chao YP; Huang CG; Fang JT; Wang SL; Chuang CK; Kang CJ; Hsin LJ; Lin WN; Fang TJ; Li HY
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e56. PubMed ID: 29439943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
