453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802215)
1. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of MRI with dedicated head and neck signal amplification coil and cone beam computed tomography: MRI is a useful tool in diagnostics of cranio-facial growth disorders.
Grandoch A; Nestmann F; Kreppel M; Buller J; Borggrefe J; Zirk M; Zöller JE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31439410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility.
Juerchott A; Saleem MA; Hilgenfeld T; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):13029. PubMed ID: 30158656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics.
Halim IA; Park JH; Liou EJW; Zeinalddin M; Al Samawi YS; Bay RC
Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 32418067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometry without complex dedicated postprocessing in an oriented magnetic resonance imaging dataset: a pilot study.
März K; Chepura T; Plewig B; Haddad D; Weber D; Schmid M; Hirschfelder U; Gölz L
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):614-621. PubMed ID: 33735379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
