107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802231)
1. Comparison of pathology sampling protocols for pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.
Grillo F; Ferro J; Vanoli A; Delfanti S; Pitto F; Peñuela L; Bianchi R; Grami O; Fiocca R; Mastracci L
Virchows Arch; 2020 May; 476(5):735-744. PubMed ID: 31802231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Standardization of pancreatic cancer specimen pathological examination].
Hlavsa J; Procházka V; Mazanec J; Hausnerová J; Pavlík T; Andrašina T; Novotný I; Penka I; Kala Z
Rozhl Chir; 2014 Mar; 93(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 24720716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3 Ways of Dissecting the Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimen and Their Impact in the Lymph Node Count and the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio.
Lino-Silva LS; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Segales-Rojas P; Zepeda-Najar C
Int J Surg Pathol; 2018 Dec; 26(8):707-713. PubMed ID: 29873282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Value of Resection Margin Involvement After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Updates From a French Prospective Multicenter Study.
Delpero JR; Jeune F; Bachellier P; Regenet N; Le Treut YP; Paye F; Carrere N; Sauvanet A; Adham M; Autret A; Poizat F; Turrini O; Boher JM
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):787-796. PubMed ID: 28953554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologic Evaluation of Surgical Margins in Pancreatic Cancer Specimens Using Color Coding With Tissue Marking Dyes.
Takahashi D; Kojima M; Sugimoto M; Kobayashi S; Takahashi S; Konishi M; Gotohda N; Nagino M
Pancreas; 2018 Aug; 47(7):830-836. PubMed ID: 29975353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic indicators following curative pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: A retrospective multivariate analysis of a single centre experience.
Petrou A; Soonawalla Z; Silva MA; Manzelli A; Moris D; Tabet PP; Friend P
J BUON; 2016; 21(4):874-882. PubMed ID: 27685908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of the lymph node ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Impact on patient stratification and prognosis.
La Torre M; Cavallini M; Ramacciato G; Cosenza G; Rossi Del Monte S; Nigri G; Ferri M; Mercantini P; Ziparo V
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 104(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 21713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin.
Campbell F; Smith RA; Whelan P; Sutton R; Raraty M; Neoptolemos JP; Ghaneh P
Histopathology; 2009 Sep; 55(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 19723142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.
Sperti C; Gruppo M; Blandamura S; Valmasoni M; Pozza G; Passuello N; Beltrame V; Moletta L
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(24):4399-4406. PubMed ID: 28706422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic implications of the standardized study of resection margins in pancreatic cancers.
Sabater L; Gómez-Mateo Mdel C; López-Sebastián J; Muñoz-Forner E; Morera-Ocón F; Cervantes A; Roselló S; Camps-Vilata B; Ferrández A; Ortega J
Cir Esp; 2014 Oct; 92(8):532-8. PubMed ID: 24878428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. R0 Versus R1 Resection Matters after Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and Less after Distal or Total Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.
Demir IE; Jäger C; Schlitter AM; Konukiewitz B; Stecher L; Schorn S; Tieftrunk E; Scheufele F; Calavrezos L; Schirren R; Esposito I; Weichert W; Friess H; Ceyhan GO
Ann Surg; 2018 Dec; 268(6):1058-1068. PubMed ID: 28692477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.
Sierzega M; Bobrzyński Ł; Matyja A; Kulig J
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):248. PubMed ID: 27644962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different approaches to assessment of lymph nodes and surgical margin status in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Liszka Ł; Pajak J; Zielińska-Pajak E; Gołka D; Mrowiec S; Lampe P
Pathology; 2010 Feb; 42(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 20085515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relevance of positive resection margins in ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma and prognostic factors.
Ocaña J; Sanjuanbenito A; García A; Molina JM; Lisa E; Mendía E; Saavedra C; Lobo E
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Feb; 98(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 31395275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. R1 resection in pancreatic cancer has significant impact on long-term outcome in standardized pathology modified for routine use.
Rau BM; Moritz K; Schuschan S; Alsfasser G; Prall F; Klar E
Surgery; 2012 Sep; 152(3 Suppl 1):S103-11. PubMed ID: 22766366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.
Dhall D; Shi J; Allende DS; Jang KT; Basturk O; Adsay V; Kim GE
Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 Oct; 45(10):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 33899790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival.
Kato K; Yamada S; Sugimoto H; Kanazumi N; Nomoto S; Takeda S; Kodera Y; Morita S; Nakao A
Pancreas; 2009 Aug; 38(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 19629002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized grossing protocol is useful for the pathology reporting of malignant neoplasms other than adenocarcinomas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Liszka Ł; Mrowiec S; Kuśnierz K; Kajor M
Histol Histopathol; 2017 Feb; 32(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 27180587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
Tol JA; Brosens LA; van Dieren S; van Gulik TM; Busch OR; Besselink MG; Gouma DJ
Br J Surg; 2015 Feb; 102(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25529117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
