These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802257)

  • 21. Site selection for waste vegetable oil and waste battery collection boxes: a GIS-based hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach.
    Çalış Boyacı A; Şişman A; Sarıcaoğlu K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17431-17444. PubMed ID: 33398726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and application of the decision support system for municipal solid waste management in central Taiwan.
    Chang YJ; Lin MD
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):435-46. PubMed ID: 23444151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways.
    Khan MM; Jain S; Vaezi M; Kumar A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():548-564. PubMed ID: 26496882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fast methodology to design the optimal collection point locations and number of waste bins: A case study.
    Boskovic G; Jovicic N
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1094-102. PubMed ID: 26467320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. GIS-based modelling for the estimation of municipal solid waste generation and collection.
    Karadimas NV; Loumos VG
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Aug; 26(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 18727325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimization of waste collection through the sequencing of micro-routes and transfer station convenience analysis: An Argentinian case study.
    Molfese Greco SA; Rossit DG; Frutos M; Cavallin A
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Jul; 41(7):1267-1279. PubMed ID: 36912470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variables Influencing per Capita Production, Separate Collection, and Costs of Municipal Solid Waste in the Apulia Region (Italy): An Experience of Deep Learning.
    Fasano F; Addante AS; Valenzano B; Scannicchio G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33477308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustainable pattern analysis of a publicly owned Material Recovery Facility in a fast-growing urban setting under uncertainty.
    Davila E; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):337-51. PubMed ID: 15854727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Costs and benefits of pneumatic collection in three specific New York City cases.
    Miller B; Spertus J; Kamga C
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1957-66. PubMed ID: 25041691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Generation, storage, collection and transportation of municipal solid waste--a case study in the city of Kathmandu, capital of Nepal.
    Alam R; Chowdhury MA; Hasan GM; Karanjit B; Shrestha LR
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(6):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17512184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An inexact dynamic optimization model for municipal solid waste management in association with greenhouse gas emission control.
    Lu HW; Huang GH; He L; Zeng GM
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):396-409. PubMed ID: 18096299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Geographic information system and system dynamics combination technique for municipal solid waste treatment station site selection.
    Wang C; Zou F; Yap JBH; Tang R; Li H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 May; 194(7):457. PubMed ID: 35612675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Urban solid waste collection system using mathematical modelling and tools of geographic information systems.
    Arribas CA; Blazquez CA; Lamas A
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Apr; 28(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 19942643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Report: cost and financing of municipal solid waste collection services in Istanbul.
    Doğan K; Süleyman S
    Waste Manag Res; 2003 Oct; 21(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 14661896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A facility location model for municipal solid waste management system under uncertain environment.
    Yadav V; Bhurjee AK; Karmakar S; Dikshit AK
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():760-771. PubMed ID: 28395953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Possibility of the most cost efficient choice: a divided process approach to method and location selection for municipal solid waste management.
    Korucu MK; Cihan A; Alkan A; Ozbay I; Karademir A; Aladag Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1073-82. PubMed ID: 25245295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study.
    Unal M; Cilek A; Guner ED
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 May; 38(1_suppl):45-64. PubMed ID: 31845834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey.
    Turan NG; Coruh S; Akdemir A; Ergun ON
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 18644708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey.
    Bilgilioglu SS; Gezgin C; Orhan O; Karakus P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(4):5313-5329. PubMed ID: 34417701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste management in Jordan.
    Abu Qdais HA
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(11):1666-72. PubMed ID: 17049834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.