These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802395)

  • 1. Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies.
    Van Hooren B; Fuller JT; Buckley JD; Miller JR; Sewell K; Rao G; Barton C; Bishop C; Willy RW
    Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 50(4):785-813. PubMed ID: 31802395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review.
    Semaan MB; Wallard L; Ruiz V; Gillet C; Leteneur S; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():249-257. PubMed ID: 34890914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Crossover Studies Comparing Physiological, Perceptual and Performance Measures Between Treadmill and Overground Running.
    Miller JR; Van Hooren B; Bishop C; Buckley JD; Willy RW; Fuller JT
    Sports Med; 2019 May; 49(5):763-782. PubMed ID: 30847825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Curved non-motorized treadmills do not biomechanically replicate overground running better than motorized treadmills.
    Catalá-Vilaplana I; Liu T; Vienneau J; Nigg SR; Pérez-Soriano P; Encarnación-Martínez A
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Nov; 41(21):1927-1933. PubMed ID: 38258795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running.
    Sinclair J; Richards J; Taylor PJ; Edmundson CJ; Brooks D; Hobbs SJ
    Sports Biomech; 2013 Sep; 12(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 24245052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treadmill vs. overground running gait during childhood: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Rozumalski A; Novacheck TF; Griffith CJ; Walt K; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):613-8. PubMed ID: 25662042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Both Motorized and Nonmotorized Treadmill Gait Kinematics to Overground Locomotion.
    Fullenkamp AM; Tolusso DV; Laurent CM; Campbell BM; Cripps AE
    J Sport Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 27(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 28605231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.
    Fellin RE; Rose WC; Royer TD; Davis IS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2010 Nov; 13(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 20478742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill.
    Caekenberghe IV; Segers V; Aerts P; Willems P; De Clercq D
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jul; 10(84):20130222. PubMed ID: 23676896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower between-limb asymmetry during running on treadmill compared to overground in subjects with laterally pronounced knee osteoarthritis.
    Robadey J; Staudenmann D; Schween R; Gehring D; Gollhofer A; Taube W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205191. PubMed ID: 30335784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Riley PO; Dicharry J; Franz J; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Kerrigan DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jun; 40(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 18460996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of sagittal plane gait characteristics between the overground and treadmill approach for gait analysis in typically developing children.
    Senden R; Marcellis R; Meijer K; Willems P; Lenssen T; Staal H; Janssen Y; Groen V; Vermeulen RJ; Witlox M
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13752. PubMed ID: 35898943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical differences between treadmill and overground walking in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Vickery-Howe DM; Bonanno DR; Dascombe BJ; Drain JR; Clarke AC; Hoolihan B; Willy RW; Middleton KJ
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Dec; 41(23):2088-2120. PubMed ID: 38350022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patellofemoral Joint and Achilles Tendon Loads During Overground and Treadmill Running.
    Willy RW; Halsey L; Hayek A; Johnson H; Willson JD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Aug; 46(8):664-72. PubMed ID: 27170525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.
    Chambon N; Delattre N; Guéguen N; Berton E; Rao G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 May; 115(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 25501676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.
    Fellin RE; Manal K; Davis IS
    J Appl Biomech; 2010 Nov; 26(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 21245500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Nigg BM; De Boer RW; Fisher V
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 7898346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training volume on footstrike patterns over an exhaustive run.
    Urbaczka J; Silvernail JF; Jandacka D
    Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():240-246. PubMed ID: 34753001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running.
    Wank V; Frick U; Schmidtbleicher D
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 19(7):455-61. PubMed ID: 9839841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.