122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802462)
1. Use of electrical impedance spectroscopy as an adjunct to colposcopy in a pathway of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnostics.
Homola W; Fuchs T; Baranski P; Zimmer A; Zimmer M; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(11):628-632. PubMed ID: 31802462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic comparison of electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy and HPV mRNA-testing in the prediction of CIN2+ women in Greece.
Tsampazis N; Vavoulidis E; Siarkou CM; Siarkou GM; Pratilas GC; Symeonidou M; Intzes S; Petousis S; Papanikolaou A; Dinas K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1222-1229. PubMed ID: 36658620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased detection of high grade CIN, when using electrical impedance spectroscopy as an adjunct to routine colposcopy, is maintained when used across international boundaries: Prospective data from nine European countries.
Tidy JA; Brown BH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Aug; 275():41-45. PubMed ID: 35724563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy.
Tidy JA; Brown BH; Healey TJ; Daayana S; Martin M; Prendiville W; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 23289897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of using electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan) on the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing high grade squamous lesions of the cervix.
Muszynski C; Dupont E; Vaysse B; Lanta S; Tidy J; Sergent F; Gondry J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 46(9):669-673. PubMed ID: 28866125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Women Diagnosed with Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Cytology.
Panagakis G; Papapanagiotou IK; Theofanakis C; Tsetsa P; Kontogeorgi A; Thomakos N; Rodolakis A; Haidopoulos D
Life (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 38004279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for assessing suspected cervical abnormalities: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Peron M; Llewellyn A; Moe-Byrne T; Walker S; Walton M; Harden M; Palmer S; Simmonds M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Sep; 22(54):1-260. PubMed ID: 30284968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folate receptor-mediated cervical staining as an adjunct to colposcopy which can improve the diagnostic accuracy of detecting high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Homola W; Pomorski M; Zimmer A; Baranski P; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(5):247-250. PubMed ID: 32495929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of high risk HPV genotype on colposcopic performance: A large prospective study demonstrates improved detection of disease with ZedScan I, particularly in non-HPV 16 patients.
Macdonald MC; Brown BH; Lyon RE; Healey TJ; Palmer JE; Tidy JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Apr; 211():194-198. PubMed ID: 28292693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopy and additive diagnostic value of biopsies from colposcopy-negative areas to detect cervical dysplasia.
Baasland I; Hagen B; Vogt C; Valla M; Romundstad PR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1258-1263. PubMed ID: 27564523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy vs dynamic spectral imaging directed biopsy in correctly identifying the grade of cervical dysplasia in women undergoing conization: A methodological study.
Booth BB; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Johansen T; Mertz H; Dahl K; Bor P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Aug; 99(8):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 32105344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of age and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status on the prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in women with persistent hrHPV-positive, cytology-negative screening samples: a prospective cohort study.
Tidy JA; Lyon R; Ellis K; Macdonald M; Palmer JE
BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 32279427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women.
Dempster-Rivett K; Innes CR; Simcock BJ; Harker D; Williman JA; Van Der Griend RA; Whitehead M; Hibma M; Lawton BA; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Faherty J; Bergzoll C; Eva L; Sadler L; Pather S; Wrede CD; Sykes PH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 223(3):408.e1-408.e11. PubMed ID: 32109465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo optical cellular diagnosis for uterine cervical or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia using flexible gastrointestinal endocytoscopy -a prospective pilot study.
Ono S; Nozaki A; Matsuda K; Takakuwa E; Sakamoto N; Watari H
BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):955. PubMed ID: 33008349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.
Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Nishide K; Nozue A; Shimabukuro K; Endo S; Nagai K; Oki A; Minaguchi T; Morishita Y; Noguchi M; Yoshikawa H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 20(3):579-85. PubMed ID: 25145298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Dynamic Spectral Imaging System colposcopy replace conventional colposcopy in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions?
Roensbo MT; Hammer A; Blaakaer J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 25845907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
