BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802464)

  • 1. Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Yalcin Y; Yalcin SE
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(11):640-644. PubMed ID: 31802464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Janssen PF; Brölmann HA; van Kesteren PJ; Bongers MY; Thurkow AL; Heymans MW; Huirne JA
    BJOG; 2011 Dec; 118(13):1568-75. PubMed ID: 21895949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
    Aytan H; Nazik H; Narin R; Api M; Tok EC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):650-5. PubMed ID: 24462850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Industry-Leading Energy Devices for Use in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure Energy Devices.
    Shiber LJ; Ginn DN; Jan A; Gaskins JT; Biscette SM; Pasic R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):467-473.e1. PubMed ID: 29032252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bipolar Energy Instruments in Laparoscopic Uterine Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Study.
    Taşkın S; Şükür YE; Altın D; Turgay B; Varlı B; Baytaş V; Ortaç F
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jun; 28(6):645-649. PubMed ID: 29323616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zorzato PC; Ferrari FA; Garzon S; Franchi M; Cianci S; Laganà AS; Chiantera V; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Uccella S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 309(4):1165-1174. PubMed ID: 37955717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the LigaSure vessel sealing device in the large uterus at laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Biçer M; Güner Z; Karas C; Güclü A; Göl M
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2016; 43(6):880-882. PubMed ID: 29944243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two advanced vessel sealing technologies in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Aykan Yuksel B; Karadag B; Mulayim B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2220-2227. PubMed ID: 31423703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Cho HY; Choi KJ; Lee YL; Chang KH; Kim HB; Park SH
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 23318073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accessibility and surgical outcomes of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy using straight instruments for hysterectomy in difficult conditions.
    Huang CY; Wu KY; Su H; Han CM; Wu PJ; Wang CJ; Lee CL; Yen CF
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 25510685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Conventional Bipolar-Electrosurgery versus High-Pressure Pulsed LigaSure Use.
    Batra S; Bhardwaj P; Dagar M
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2022; 11(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 35746909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-Use Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Holloran-Schwartz MB; Gavard JA; Martin JC; Blaskiewicz RJ; Yeung PP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26318400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
    Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gasless Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with New Abdominal-Wall Retraction System.
    Kim MK; Hwang JH; Kim JH; Kim SR; Lee SB; Kim BW
    JSLS; 2020; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 32161436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic type 7 total hysterectomy and adnexectomy with or without Burch colposuspension: operative technique with the LigaSure device and results.
    Surgit O; Gumus II; Derbent A; Simavli S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 22042165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral uterine artery coagulation in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease in uteri more than 1000 g.
    Sezgin B; Camuzcuoğlu A; Küçük M; Camuzcuoğlu H
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jan; 46(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 31646706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using modern bipolar electrosurgical instruments based on the ForceTriad energy platform.
    Shen-Gunther J; Shank JJ
    Mil Med; 2010 Aug; 175(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 20731267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri.
    Walsh TM; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Ng V; Zurawin R; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1231-6. PubMed ID: 26164535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.