These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31802714)

  • 1. Public Acceptability of Gene Therapy and Gene Editing for Human Use: A Systematic Review.
    Delhove J; Osenk I; Prichard I; Donnelley M
    Hum Gene Ther; 2020 Jan; 31(1-2):20-46. PubMed ID: 31802714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Need for Better Understanding Is the Major Determinant for Public Perceptions of Human Gene Editing.
    McCaughey T; Budden DM; Sanfilippo PG; Gooden GEC; Fan L; Fenwick E; Rees G; MacGregor C; Si L; Chen C; Liang HH; Pébay A; Baldwin T; Hewitt AW
    Hum Gene Ther; 2019 Jan; 30(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 29926763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Germline Editing: Editors Cautionary.
    Krishan K; Kanchan T; Singh B; Baryah N; Puri S
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(2):e58-e59. PubMed ID: 29595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: A systematic review.
    Babačić H; Mehta A; Merkel O; Schoser B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212198. PubMed ID: 30794581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survey on the perception of germline genome editing among the general public in Japan.
    Uchiyama M; Nagai A; Muto K
    J Hum Genet; 2018 Jun; 63(6):745-748. PubMed ID: 29545588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Macpherson K; Elston L; Myles S; Washington J; Sungum N; Briggs M; Newsome PN; Calvert MJ
    Nat Commun; 2020 Dec; 11(1):6265. PubMed ID: 33293538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Should Clinicians Do to Engage the Public About Gene Editing?
    Alsaigh T; Nicholson L; Topol E
    AMA J Ethics; 2019 Dec; 21(12):E1089-1097. PubMed ID: 31876474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical application of gene editing: ethical and social issues.
    Ormond KE; Bombard Y; Bonham VL; Hoffman-Andrews L; Howard H; Isasi R; Musunuru K; Riggan KA; Michie M; Allyse M
    Per Med; 2019 Jul; 16(4):337-350. PubMed ID: 31331245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public acceptance of human gene therapy and perceptions of human genetic manipulation.
    Macer DR
    Hum Gene Ther; 1992 Oct; 3(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 1420449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.
    Jordan J; Rose L; Dainty KN; Noyes J; Blackwood B
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD011812. PubMed ID: 27699783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public views about editing genes in wildlife for conservation.
    Kohl PA; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Xenos MA
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1286-1295. PubMed ID: 30848502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ethics of genome editing in the clinic: A dose of realism for healthcare leaders.
    Bubela T; Mansour Y; Nicol D
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2017 May; 30(3):159-163. PubMed ID: 28929852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing.
    Riggan KA; Sharp RR; Allyse M
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Oct; 29(12):1823-1835. PubMed ID: 31057062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
    Husk K; Lovell R; Cooper C; Stahl-Timmins W; Garside R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD010351. PubMed ID: 27207731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring HPV Knowledge, Awareness, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Vaccine Acceptability of Latino Fathers Living in the United States: An Integrative Review.
    Suárez P; Wallington SF; Greaney ML; Lindsay AC
    J Community Health; 2019 Aug; 44(4):844-856. PubMed ID: 30847716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ethics of creating genetically modified children using genome editing.
    Ishii T
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2017 Dec; 24(6):418-423. PubMed ID: 28885275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.
    van Dijke I; Bosch L; Bredenoord AL; Cornel M; Repping S; Hendriks S
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1777-1796. PubMed ID: 30085071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should human germ line editing be allowed? Some suggestions on the basis of the existing regulatory framework.
    de Miguel Beriain I
    Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30080925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent Advances in Therapeutic Genome Editing in China.
    Yang Y; Wang Q; Li Q; Men K; He Z; Deng H; Ji W; Wei Y
    Hum Gene Ther; 2018 Feb; 29(2):136-145. PubMed ID: 29446996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics of Human Genome Editing.
    Coller BS
    Annu Rev Med; 2019 Jan; 70():289-305. PubMed ID: 30691366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.