These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31803209)

  • 1. Induced Genetic Variation in Crop Plants by Random or Targeted Mutagenesis: Convergence and Differences.
    Holme IB; Gregersen PL; Brinch-Pedersen H
    Front Plant Sci; 2019; 10():1468. PubMed ID: 31803209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Certain new plant breeding techniques and their marketability in the context of EU GMO legislation - recent developments.
    Zimny T; Sowa S; Tyczewska A; Twardowski T
    N Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 51():49-56. PubMed ID: 30779963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Judgment of the CJEU of 25 July 2018 on Mutagenesis: Interpretation and Interim Legislative Proposal.
    Vives-Vallés JA; Collonnier C
    Front Plant Sci; 2019; 10():1813. PubMed ID: 32194576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.
    Eriksson D
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Mar; 132(3):569-573. PubMed ID: 30328510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?
    Jorasch P
    Plant Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 39(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 31754780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU.
    Hartung F; Schiemann J
    Plant J; 2014 Jun; 78(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 24330272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
    Davison J; Ammann K
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 28278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.
    Jorasch P
    Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():582011. PubMed ID: 33101349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    Bruetschy C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):169-174. PubMed ID: 31321701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Swedish policy approach to directed mutagenesis in a European context.
    Eriksson D
    Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 29602252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing.
    Hundleby PAC; Harwood WA
    Food Energy Secur; 2019 May; 8(2):e00161. PubMed ID: 31423300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.
    Schulman AH; Oksman-Caldentey KM; Teeri TH
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2020 Jan; 18(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 31246337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward.
    Eriksson D; Kershen D; Nepomuceno A; Pogson BJ; Prieto H; Purnhagen K; Smyth S; Wesseler J; Whelan A
    New Phytol; 2019 Jun; 222(4):1673-1684. PubMed ID: 30548610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Roads Forward for European GMO Policy-Uncertainties in Wake of ECJ Judgment Have to be Mitigated by Regulatory Reform.
    Wasmer M
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():132. PubMed ID: 31231643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Romanian experience and perspective on the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe.
    Ichim MC
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Feb; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30238377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application of new breeding technology based on gene editing in pig industry - A review.
    Tu CF; Chuang CK; Yang TS
    Anim Biosci; 2022 Jun; 35(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 34991204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Economics of Regulating New Plant Breeding Technologies - Implications for the Bioeconomy Illustrated by a Survey Among Dutch Plant Breeders.
    Wesseler J; Politiek H; Zilberman D
    Front Plant Sci; 2019; 10():1597. PubMed ID: 31921246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agriculture R&D Implications of the CJEU's Gene-Specific Mutagenesis Ruling.
    Smyth SJ; Lassoued R
    Trends Biotechnol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):337-340. PubMed ID: 30293646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Possible
    Escajedo San-Epifanio L; Filibi I; Lasa López A; Puigdomènech P; Uncetabarrenechea Larrabe J
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1141455. PubMed ID: 37008488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.
    Whelan AI; Lema MA
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):253-65. PubMed ID: 26552666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.