371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31803478)
1. 'Reduced' HUNT model outperforms NLST and NELSON study criteria in predicting lung cancer in the Danish screening trial.
Røe OD; Markaki M; Tsamardinos I; Lagani V; Nguyen OTD; Pedersen JH; Saghir Z; Ashraf HG
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2019; 6(1):e000512. PubMed ID: 31803478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selecting High-Risk Individuals for Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Evaluation of Existing Risk Models and Eligibility Criteria in the German EPIC Cohort.
Li K; Hüsing A; Sookthai D; Bergmann M; Boeing H; Becker N; Kaaks R
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2015 Sep; 8(9):777-85. PubMed ID: 26076698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Economic impact of lung cancer screening in France: A modeling study].
Gendarme S; Perrot É; Reskot F; Bhoowabul V; Fourre G; Souquet PJ; Milleron B; Couraud S
Rev Mal Respir; 2017 Sep; 34(7):717-728. PubMed ID: 26585377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.
Ten Haaf K; Jeon J; Tammemägi MC; Han SS; Kong CY; Plevritis SK; Feuer EJ; de Koning HJ; Steyerberg EW; Meza R
PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002277. PubMed ID: 28376113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Berg CD; Cheung LC; Chaturvedi AK
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(21):2300-11. PubMed ID: 27179989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the lung cancer risks at which to screen ever- and never-smokers: screening rules applied to the PLCO and NLST cohorts.
Tammemägi MC; Church TR; Hocking WG; Silvestri GA; Kvale PA; Riley TL; Commins J; Berg CD
PLoS Med; 2014 Dec; 11(12):e1001764. PubMed ID: 25460915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early detection of lung cancer in Czech high-risk asymptomatic individuals (ELEGANCE): A study protocol.
Lambert L; Janouskova L; Novak M; Bircakova B; Meckova Z; Votruba J; Michalek P; Burgetova A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Feb; 100(5):e23878. PubMed ID: 33592843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry study.
Jensen MD; Siersma V; Rasmussen JF; Brodersen J
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e031768. PubMed ID: 31969362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Lung Cancer Screening Selection: The HUNT Lung Cancer Risk Model for Ever-Smokers Versus the NELSON and 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force Criteria in the Cohort of Norway: A Population-Based Prospective Study.
Nguyen OTD; Fotopoulos I; Markaki M; Tsamardinos I; Lagani V; Røe OD
JTO Clin Res Rep; 2024 Apr; 5(4):100660. PubMed ID: 38586302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
Tammemagi MC; Schmidt H; Martel S; McWilliams A; Goffin JR; Johnston MR; Nicholas G; Tremblay A; Bhatia R; Liu G; Soghrati K; Yasufuku K; Hwang DM; Laberge F; Gingras M; Pasian S; Couture C; Mayo JR; Nasute Fauerbach PV; Atkar-Khattra S; Peacock SJ; Cressman S; Ionescu D; English JC; Finley RJ; Yee J; Puksa S; Stewart L; Tsai S; Haider E; Boylan C; Cutz JC; Manos D; Xu Z; Goss GD; Seely JM; Amjadi K; Sekhon HS; Burrowes P; MacEachern P; Urbanski S; Sin DD; Tan WC; Leighl NB; Shepherd FA; Evans WK; Tsao MS; Lam S;
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 29055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting.
Treskova M; Aumann I; Golpon H; Vogel-Claussen J; Welte T; Kuhlmann A
BMC Med; 2017 Aug; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 28838313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving selection criteria for lung cancer screening. The potential role of emphysema.
Sanchez-Salcedo P; Wilson DO; de-Torres JP; Weissfeld JL; Berto J; Campo A; Alcaide AB; Pueyo J; Bastarrika G; Seijo LM; Pajares MJ; Pio R; Montuenga LM; Zulueta JJ
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 Apr; 191(8):924-31. PubMed ID: 25668622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.
Tammemägi MC; Katki HA; Hocking WG; Church TR; Caporaso N; Kvale PA; Chaturvedi AK; Silvestri GA; Riley TL; Commins J; Berg CD
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 23425165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening: Going beyond NLST criteria.
Fu M; Travier N; Martín-Sánchez JC; Martínez-Sánchez JM; Vidal C; Garcia M;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195441. PubMed ID: 29621354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT screening (NELSON): a prespecified analysis of screening test performance and interval cancers.
Horeweg N; Scholten ET; de Jong PA; van der Aalst CM; Weenink C; Lammers JW; Nackaerts K; Vliegenthart R; ten Haaf K; Yousaf-Khan UA; Heuvelmans MA; Thunnissen E; Oudkerk M; Mali W; de Koning HJ
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Nov; 15(12):1342-50. PubMed ID: 25282284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit-to-radiation-risk of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening.
Hendrick RE; Smith RA
Cancer; 2024 Jan; 130(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 37909872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
