159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31804106)
1. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():208-224. PubMed ID: 30315866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of brief post-sample cues signaling presence or absence of reinforcers in delayed matching-to-sample.
Gomes-Ng S; Baharrizki D; Cowie S; Elliffe D; Bai JYH
Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104664. PubMed ID: 35654309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
Davison M; Cowie S
J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Being there on time: Reinforcer effects on timing and locating.
Cowie S; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):340-362. PubMed ID: 31994217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Distractor" effects in delay discounting of probability by pigeons.
Mueller PM; Peng DN; Zentall TR
Anim Cogn; 2023 Jun; 26(3):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 36853524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus control depends on the subjective value of the outcome.
Cowie S; Gomes-Ng S; Hopkinson B; Bai JYH; Landon J
J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Sep; 114(2):216-232. PubMed ID: 32820528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
