These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31805708)

  • 1. Evaluation of Patellar Contact Pressure Changes after Static versus Dynamic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstructions Using a Finite Element Model.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V; Ginovart G; Alastruey-López D; Montesinos-Berry E; Monllau JC; Alberich-Bayarri A; Pérez MA
    J Clin Med; 2019 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 31805708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Patellofemoral Kinematics and Stability After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Spang R; Egan J; Hanna P; Lechtig A; Haber D; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(9):2252-2259. PubMed ID: 32551965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
    Stephen JM; Kaider D; Lumpaopong P; Deehan DJ; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 24275861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Method on Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and Kinematics.
    Stephen JM; Kittl C; Williams A; Zaffagnini S; Marcheggiani Muccioli GM; Fink C; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 May; 44(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 26944575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parametric finite element model of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction model development and clinical validation.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V; Alastruey-López D; Ginovart G; Montesinos-Berry E; García-Castro F; Ramírez-Fuentes C; Monllau JC; Alberich-Bayarri A; Pérez MA
    J Exp Orthop; 2019 Jul; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31278510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Ligament Isometry and Patellofemoral Contact Pressures for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients.
    Black SR; Meyers KN; Nguyen JT; Green DW; Brady JM; Maher SA; Shubin Stein BE
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3557-3565. PubMed ID: 33135907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Technique on Patellofemoral Contact Pressure, Contact Area, and Kinematics.
    White AE; James EW; Jahandar A; Jones RH; Fabricant PD
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jun; ():3635465241252818. PubMed ID: 38872411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to correct patellar kinematics and contact mechanics in the presence of a lateralized tibial tubercle.
    Stephen JM; Dodds AL; Lumpaopong P; Kader D; Williams A; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Sep; 43(9):2198-207. PubMed ID: 26290576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patellofemoral Pressure Changes After Static and Dynamic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstructions.
    Rood A; Hannink G; Lenting A; Groenen K; Koëter S; Verdonschot N; van Kampen A
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2538-44. PubMed ID: 26283233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Simulation of the Effects of Graft Fixation Errors During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Elias JJ; Kelly MJ; Smith KE; Gall KA; Farr J
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 4(9):2325967116665080. PubMed ID: 27709116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Techniques Shows Medial Overconstraint but No Significant Difference in Patella Lateralization and Contact Pressure.
    Dahm F; Syed H; Tomescu S; Lin HA; Haimovich Y; Chandrashekar N; Whyne C; Wasserstein D
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Mar; 39(3):662-669. PubMed ID: 36328339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Impact of Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation on Dynamic Patellofemoral Contact Pressure-A Biomechanical Study.
    Lorbach O; Zumbansen N; Kieb M; Efe T; Pizanis A; Kohn D; Haupert A
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Apr; 34(4):1072-1082. PubMed ID: 29305291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Adductor-Transfer and Adductor-Sling at Nonanatomic Femoral Attachment Sites Leads to Unfavorable Graft-Length Change Patterns: A Descriptive Biomechanical Study.
    Xu J; Ye Z; Qiao Y; Xu C; Han K; Chen J; Dong S; Zhao J
    Arthroscopy; 2022 May; 38(5):1557-1567. PubMed ID: 34767953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure.
    Zumbansen N; Haupert A; Kohn D; Lorbach O
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 31740983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V; Ramirez-Fuentes C; Montesinos-Berry E; Domenech J; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Aug; 25(8):2433-2441. PubMed ID: 26658569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison.
    Mehl J; Otto A; Comer B; Kia C; Liska F; Obopilwe E; Beitzel K; Imhoff AB; Fulkerson JP; Imhoff FB
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Feb; 28(2):478-488. PubMed ID: 31410528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft.
    Lorbach O; Haupert A; Efe T; Pizanis A; Weyers I; Kohn D; Kieb M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Aug; 25(8):2502-2510. PubMed ID: 26820966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament?
    Ntagiopoulos PG; Sharma B; Bignozzi S; Lopomo N; Colle F; Zaffagnini S; Dejour D
    Int Orthop; 2013 Oct; 37(10):1933-41. PubMed ID: 23771189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Techniques Are Not Equivalent at Lower Flexion in the Setting of Patella Alta: A Biomechanical Comparison.
    Dandu N; Trasolini NA; Shewman EF; Kim HD; Zavras AG; Huddleston HP; Browning RB; Yanke AB
    Arthroscopy; 2022 Aug; 38(8):2493-2503. PubMed ID: 35157963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic and Biomechanical Properties of Flat Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adductor Magnus Tendon Graft: A Human Cadaveric Study.
    Milinkovic DD; Fink C; Kittl C; Sillanpää P; Herbst E; Raschke MJ; Herbort M
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jun; 49(7):1827-1838. PubMed ID: 33960859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.