These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31805871)
1. Effectiveness, benefit harm and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Austria. Jahn B; Sroczynski G; Bundo M; Mühlberger N; Puntscher S; Todorovic J; Rochau U; Oberaigner W; Koffijberg H; Fischer T; Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Öfner D; Renner F; Jonas M; Hackl M; Ferlitsch M; Siebert U; BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):209. PubMed ID: 31805871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand. Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France. Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Westwood M; Corro Ramos I; Lang S; Luyendijk M; Zaim R; Stirk L; Al M; Armstrong N; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(33):1-234. PubMed ID: 28643629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing. Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population. Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare. Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term benefits and harms of early colorectal cancer screening in German individuals with familial cancer risk. Sroczynski G; Hallsson LR; Mühlberger N; Jahn B; Rehms R; Hoffmann S; Crispin A; Lindoerfer D; Mansmann U; Siebert U Int J Cancer; 2024 Feb; 154(3):516-529. PubMed ID: 37795630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test. Senore C; Hassan C; Regge D; Pagano E; Iussich G; Correale L; Segnan N J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 30180780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The economic evaluation of screening for colorectal cancer: Case of Iran. Barouni M; Ghaderi H; Shahmoradi MK Clin Lab; 2013; 59(5-6):667-74. PubMed ID: 23865368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia. Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harms, benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing versus guaiac fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening. Goede SL; Rabeneck L; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Paszat LF; Hoch JS; Yong JH; Kroep S; Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172864. PubMed ID: 28296927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and risk score. Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Sakamoto T; Saito Y; Esaki M; Matsuda T J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 32167186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]