These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31806261)

  • 21. Deep learning-based hemodynamic prediction of carotid artery stenosis before and after surgical treatments.
    Wang S; Wu D; Li G; Zhang Z; Xiao W; Li R; Qiao A; Jin L; Liu H
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1094743. PubMed ID: 36703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and analysis of the effect of 3-D distortion of the human aortic arch.
    Mori D; Yamaguchi T
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Jun; 5(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 12186717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Steady Flow in a Patient-Averaged Inferior Vena Cava-Part II: Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification and Validation.
    Craven BA; Aycock KI; Manning KB
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):654-673. PubMed ID: 30446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of pulsatile flowfield in healthy thoracic aorta models.
    Wen CY; Yang AS; Tseng LY; Chai JW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Feb; 38(2):391-402. PubMed ID: 19890715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fluid-structure interaction modeling in cardiovascular medicine - A systematic review 2017-2019.
    Hirschhorn M; Tchantchaleishvili V; Stevens R; Rossano J; Throckmorton A
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Apr; 78():1-13. PubMed ID: 32081559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.
    Glor FP; Westenberg JJ; Vierendeels J; Danilouchkine M; Verdonck P
    Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations.
    Saitta S; Pirola S; Piatti F; Votta E; Lucherini F; Pluchinotta F; Carminati M; Lombardi M; Geppert C; Cuomo F; Figueroa CA; Xu XY; Redaelli A
    J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():13-21. PubMed ID: 31326119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterization of Hemodynamics in Great Arteries of Wild-Type Mouse Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Based on Ultrasound Images.
    Chen Z; Zhou Y; Ma Y; Wang J; He Y; Li Z
    Ultrasound Q; 2016 Mar; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 26938034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the use of in vivo measured flow rates as boundary conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the human aorta: implications for indicators of abnormal flow.
    Gallo D; De Santis G; Negri F; Tresoldi D; Ponzini R; Massai D; Deriu MA; Segers P; Verhegghe B; Rizzo G; Morbiducci U
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 22009313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Full dimensional computer simulations to study pulsatile blood flow in vessels, aortic arch and bifurcated veins: Investigation of blood viscosity and turbulent effects.
    Sultanov RA; Guster D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4704-10. PubMed ID: 19964834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Machine Learning for Aiding Blood Flow Velocity Estimation Based on Angiography.
    Padhee S; Johnson M; Yi H; Banerjee T; Yang Z
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 36354533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Numerical simulations of flow through the aorta using both ideal and realistic geometrical models.
    Wan Ab Naim WN; Ganesan P; Al Abed A; Lim E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():653-6. PubMed ID: 23365977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Normal Variation in the Rotational Position of the Aortic Root on Hemodynamics and Tissue Biomechanics of the Thoracic Aorta.
    Sundström E; Jonnagiri R; Gutmark-Little I; Gutmark E; Critser P; Taylor MD; Tretter JT
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Feb; 11(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 31701357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physics-driven CFD modeling of complex anatomical cardiovascular flows-a TCPC case study.
    Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Ge L; Sotiropoulos F; Frakes D; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):284-300. PubMed ID: 15868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemodynamic analysis of outflow grafting positions of a ventricular assist device using closed-loop multiscale CFD simulations: Preliminary results.
    Neidlin M; Corsini C; Sonntag SJ; Schulte-Eistrup S; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Pennati G; Kaufmann TAS
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2718-2725. PubMed ID: 27298155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
    Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simulations of time harmonic blood flow in the Mesenteric artery: comparing finite element and lattice Boltzmann methods.
    Axner L; Hoekstra AG; Jeays A; Lawford P; Hose R; Sloot PM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Oct; 8():23. PubMed ID: 19799782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combined MR imaging and CFD simulation of flow in the human descending aorta.
    Wood NB; Weston SJ; Kilner PJ; Gosman AD; Firmin DN
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 May; 13(5):699-713. PubMed ID: 11329191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
    Paliwal N; Jaiswal P; Tutino VM; Shallwani H; Davies JM; Siddiqui AH; Rai R; Meng H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E7. PubMed ID: 30453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.