BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31806399)

  • 1. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.
    Liang C; Liu P; Cui Z; Liang Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 31806399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016.
    Liu P; Liang C; Lu A; Chen X; Liang W; Li D; Yin L; Li Z; Cao Y; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 32507516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for and delayed recognition of genitourinary fistula following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a population-based analysis.
    Liang C; Liu P; Kang S; Li W; Chen B; Ji M; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Mar; 34(2):e20. PubMed ID: 36603848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of annualized surgeon volume on major surgical complications for abdominal and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016: a retrospective cohort study.
    Liang C; Li W; Liu X; Zhao H; Yin L; Li M; Guo Y; Lang J; Bin X; Liu P; Chen C
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):69. PubMed ID: 36793026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
    Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
    Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.
    Malur S; Possover M; Schneider A
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 11344431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.
    Xu H; Chen Y; Li Y; Zhang Q; Wang D; Liang Z
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):960-4. PubMed ID: 17287919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.