105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31806655)
1. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment between clinicians and patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chow R; Zimmermann C; Bruera E; Temel J; Im J; Lock M
BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2020 Jun; 10(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 31806655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among healthcare professionals: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chow R; Bruera E; Temel JS; Krishnan M; Im J; Lock M
Support Care Cancer; 2020 May; 28(5):2071-2078. PubMed ID: 31900613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among health care professionals: a systematic review.
Chow R; Chiu N; Bruera E; Krishnan M; Chiu L; Lam H; DeAngelis C; Pulenzas N; Vuong S; Chow E
Ann Palliat Med; 2016 Apr; 5(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 27121736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients.
Zimmermann C; Burman D; Bandukwala S; Seccareccia D; Kaya E; Bryson J; Rodin G; Lo C
Support Care Cancer; 2010 May; 18(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 19629537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.
Paiva CE; Siquelli FA; Santos HA; Costa MM; Massaro DR; Lacerda DC; Nunes JS; de Pádua Souza C; Paiva BS
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():501. PubMed ID: 26142726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.
Azam F; Latif MF; Farooq A; Tirmazy SH; AlShahrani S; Bashir S; Bukhari N
Case Rep Oncol; 2019; 12(3):728-736. PubMed ID: 31616281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater reliability of a modified Karnofsky Scale of Performance Status for HIV-infected individuals.
Fantoni M; Izzi I; Del Borgo C; Del Forno A; Damiano F; Pezzotti P; Franzetti M; Negri C; Quirini T; Zambelli A
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 1999 Jan; 13(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11362083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools.
de Kock I; Mirhosseini M; Lau F; Thai V; Downing M; Quan H; Lesperance M; Yang J
J Palliat Care; 2013; 29(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 24380215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status.
Jang RW; Caraiscos VB; Swami N; Banerjee S; Mak E; Kaya E; Rodin G; Bryson J; Ridley JZ; Le LW; Zimmermann C
J Oncol Pract; 2014 Sep; 10(5):e335-41. PubMed ID: 25118208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a meta-analysis over a period of 49 years.
Trajković G; Starčević V; Latas M; Leštarević M; Ille T; Bukumirić Z; Marinković J
Psychiatry Res; 2011 Aug; 189(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21276619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Poor-Performance Status Assessment of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Remains Vague and Blurred in the Immunotherapy Era.
Friedlaender A; Banna GL; Buffoni L; Addeo A
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Nov; 21(12):107. PubMed ID: 31768759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients.
Taylor AE; Olver IN; Sivanthan T; Chi M; Purnell C
Support Care Cancer; 1999 Sep; 7(5):332-5. PubMed ID: 10483818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The palliative performance scale: examining its inter-rater reliability in an outpatient palliative radiation oncology clinic.
Campos S; Zhang L; Sinclair E; Tsao M; Barnes EA; Danjoux C; Sahgal A; Goh P; Culleton S; Mitera G; Chow E
Support Care Cancer; 2009 Jun; 17(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 18946683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Karnofsky (KPS) and WHO (WHO-PS) performance scores in brain tumour patients: the role of clinician bias.
Frappaz D; Bonneville-Levard A; Ricard D; Carrie S; Schiffler C; Xuan KH; Weller M
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Apr; 29(4):1883-1891. PubMed ID: 32789684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.
Buccheri G; Ferrigno D; Tamburini M
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Jun; 32A(7):1135-41. PubMed ID: 8758243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: A systematic review of measurement properties.
Behroozian T; Milton LT; Shear NH; McKenzie E; Razvi Y; Karam I; Pon K; Lam H; Lam E; Chow E
Support Care Cancer; 2021 May; 29(5):2265-2278. PubMed ID: 33205325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.
Moran RW; Schneiders AG; Major KM; Sullivan SJ
Br J Sports Med; 2016 May; 50(9):527-36. PubMed ID: 26316583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interconversion of two commonly used performance tools: An analysis of 5844 paired assessments in 1501 lung cancer patients.
Prasad KT; Kaur H; Muthu V; Aggarwal AN; Behera D; Singh N
World J Clin Oncol; 2018 Nov; 9(7):140-147. PubMed ID: 30425939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Chinese herbal medicine for side effects of transarterial chemoembolization in liver cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
Li XQ; Ling CQ
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Dec; 10(12):1341-62. PubMed ID: 23257126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
