These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3180684)
1. Research control forms and animal safety data: a case study of defensive ethics. LoVerde ME; Prochazka AV; Byyny RL Clin Res; 1988 Oct; 36(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 3180684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects. Macklin R IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ; Knudson P IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research subject loses case against physician, IRB, and hospital. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective. Bagley G Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Questions and answers. Goodwin FK J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol review within the context of a research program. Miller FG; Rosenstein DL IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal agency's final rule says informed consent forms must be dated. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11655034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues related to the protection of human research participants. Harrison L J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J; Levine RJ IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Duke's hazards. Did medical experiments put patients needlessly at risk? Kaplan S; Brownlee S US News World Rep; 1999 May; 126(20):66-8, 70. PubMed ID: 10387890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]