These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31807325)
1. Prospective analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer variability in multi ultrasound descriptor assessment of thyroid nodules. Dobruch-Sobczak K; Migda B; Krauze A; Mlosek K; Słapa RZ; Wareluk P; Bakuła-Zalewska E; Adamczewski Z; Lewiński A; Jakubowski W; Dedecjus M J Ultrason; 2019 Nov; 19(78):198-206. PubMed ID: 31807325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-observer Variability in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System: In-Depth Analysis and Areas for Improvement. Itani M; Assaker R; Moshiri M; Dubinsky TJ; Dighe MK Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):461-470. PubMed ID: 30415880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in Interpretation of Ultrasound Elastography and Gray-Scale Ultrasound in Assessing Thyroid Nodules. Koh J; Moon HJ; Park JS; Kim SJ; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kwak JY Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 26386478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the departmental inter-rater reliability when scoring thyroid nodules according to the British Thyroid Association Ultrasound-classification model: Is there significant disagreement? Rtam N Ultrasound; 2024 May; 32(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 38694831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver Variability of Sonographic Features Used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Farjat AE; Teefey SA; Abinanti N; Boschini FJ; Bronner AJ; Dahiya N; Hertzberg BS; Newman JR; Scanga D; Vogler RC; Tessler FN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):162-167. PubMed ID: 29702015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Choi SH; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Kim MJ; Son EJ Thyroid; 2010 Feb; 20(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19725777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observation Variation in Ultrasonography Assessment of Thyroid Nodules. Sharifi Y; Shafiei S; Tabesh H; Aminzadeh B; Layegh P; Mahmoodzadeh A; Zakavi SR; Eslami S Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2022; 10(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 35083347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is TIRADS a practical and accurate system for use in daily clinical practice? Chandramohan A; Khurana A; Pushpa BT; Manipadam MT; Naik D; Thomas N; Abraham D; Paul MJ Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2016; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 27081240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-observer variation in ultrasound measurement of the volume and diameter of thyroid nodules. Choi YJ; Baek JH; Hong MJ; Lee JH Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(3):560-5. PubMed ID: 25995685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. British Thyroid Association 2014 classification ultrasound scoring of thyroid nodules in predicting malignancy: Diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement. Weller A; Sharif B; Qarib MH; St Leger D; De Silva HS; Lingam RK Ultrasound; 2020 Feb; 28(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 32063989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines - Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability? Couzins M; Forbes S; Vigneswaran G; Mitra I; Rutherford EE Ultrasound; 2021 May; 29(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 33995556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan. Koyama Y; Nakashima K; Orihara S; Tsunoda H; Kimura F; Uenaka N; Ban K; Michishita Y; Kanemaki Y; Kurihara A; Tawaraya K; Taguri M; Ishikawa T; Uematsu T Breast Cancer; 2024 Jul; 31(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 38619787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]