BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3180788)

  • 1. Susceptibility to cumulative and acute irritant dermatitis. An experimental approach in human volunteers.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 3180788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irritant reactivity in males and females.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Nov; 17(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 2963725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
    Freeman S; Maibach H
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human cutaneous irritation: induced hyporeactivity.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 2962817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
    Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
    Lee CH; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (III). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans.
    Frosch PJ; Kurte A; Pilz B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 8222621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced cutaneous irritation. Comparison of white and Hispanic subjects.
    Berardesca E; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 3180780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
    Agner T
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Krebs A; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 143(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 10971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
    Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man.
    Lee JY; Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jun; 36(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 9237006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
    Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tandem repeated application of organic solvents and sodium lauryl sulphate enhances cumulative skin irritation.
    Schliemann S; Schmidt C; Elsner P
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 24457469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate.
    de Jongh CM; Jakasa I; Verberk MM; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 16536807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.