These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31808209)

  • 1. Assessing competency for remote telecytology rapid on-site evaluation using pre-recorded dynamic video streaming.
    Monaco SE; Han M; Dietz R; Xing J; Cuda J; Pantanowitz L
    Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):411-418. PubMed ID: 31808209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telecytology implementation: Deployment of telecytology for rapid on-site evaluations at an Academic Medical Center.
    Monaco SE; Koah AE; Xing J; Ahmed I; Cuda J; Cunningham J; Metahri D; Progar A; Pantanowitz L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):206-213. PubMed ID: 30588767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the job training: an educational program in ROSE of fine needle aspirates and telecytology for cytotechnologists.
    Selvaggi SM
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2018; 7(6):306-310. PubMed ID: 31043300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telecytology rapid on-site evaluation: Diagnostic challenges, technical issues and lessons learned.
    Xing J; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Pantanowitz L
    Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):402-410. PubMed ID: 31984572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: analysis of 240 consecutive cases.
    Marotti JD; Johncox V; Ng D; Gonzalez JL; Padmanabhan V
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 23075898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)-part 2: subjective views among the cytopathology community.
    Sauter JL; Chen Y; Alex D; Balassanian R; Cuda J; Flanagan MB; Griffith CC; Illei P; Johnson DN; McGrath CM; Randolph ML; Reynolds JP; Spiczka AJ; van Zante A; VanderLaan PA;
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):570-578. PubMed ID: 32861593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Society of Cytopathology Telecytology validation recommendations for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).
    Lin O; Alperstein S; Barkan GA; Cuda JM; Kezlarian B; Jhala D; Jin X; Mehrotra S; Monaco SE; Rao J; Saieg M; Thrall M; Pantanowitz L
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(2):111-121. PubMed ID: 38310002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing digital and telecytology practices post COVID-19 comparing ASC survey results from 2016 to 2023.
    Chen-Yost HI; Bammert C; Hao W; Heymann JJ; Lin DM; Marotti J; Waraksa-Deutsch T; Huang M; Krishnamurti U; Lin O; Ly A; Moatamed N; Pantanowitz L; Roy-Chowdhuri S
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 38582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telecytology rapid onsite evaluation, with real-time communication between cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, and proceduralist, offers better adequacy rates for lymph node, but not thyroid, fine-needle aspirations.
    Post R; Doxzon K; Goldberg A
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 37620222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between a traditional single still image and a multiframe video image along the z-axis of the same microscopic field of interest in cytology: Which does contribute to telecytology?
    Yamashiro K; Taira K; Matsubayashi S; Azuma M; Okuyama D; Nakajima M; Takeda H; Suzuki H; Kawamura N; Wakao F; Yagi Y
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Oct; 37(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 19373920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid on-site evaluation-Part 1: objective practice patterns.
    VanderLaan PA; Chen Y; Alex D; Balassanian R; Cuda J; Hoda RS; Illei PB; McGrath CM; Randolph ML; Reynolds JP; Spiczka AJ; VandeHaar MA; van Zante A; Sauter JL;
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(6):333-341. PubMed ID: 31495750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of different platforms to perform rapid onsite evaluation via telecytology.
    Yao K; Li Z
    Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):379-384. PubMed ID: 32506692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inexpensive telecytology solutions that use the Raspberry Pi and the iPhone.
    Dudas R; VandenBussche C; Baras A; Ali SZ; Olson MT
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2014; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31051730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation and implementation of telecytology at an academic medical center using digital cameras and Microsoft Teams software.
    Boothe P; Martinez-Amador C; Hajarat T; Gonsalves C; Donthi D; Mukhtar F; Kresak J; Leon M
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(5):329-339. PubMed ID: 38834385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remotely operated robotic microscopy for rapid diagnosis of bronchoscopic cytology specimens.
    Naso JR; Chan J; Reisenauer J; Edell ES; Stackhouse K; Bungum AO; Vierkant RA; Pierson K; Seidl A; Sturgis CD; Meroueh C; Huang Y; Hartley CP
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Sep; 51(9):554-562. PubMed ID: 37288984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training and practice of cytotechnologists: a discussion forum focused on Europe.
    Herbert A; Anic V; Cochand-Priollet B; Dina R; Ehya H; Eide ML; Fabre M; Field A; Kapila K; Kardum-Skelin I; Oliveira MH; Olszewski W; Onal B; Nasioutziki M; Nayar R; Nielsen K; Shabalova I; Schmitt F; Tötsch M; Wilson A; Vass L; Zeppa P
    Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):307-15. PubMed ID: 25209399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Telecytology and its evolving role in cytopathology.
    Khurana KK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 22619124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens using cytotechnologist-performed telecytology: Insights and advantages.
    Tinnirello AA
    Cytopathology; 2025 Jan; 36(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 39158137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The current practice of telecytology for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE): Practical considerations and limitations.
    Sarode VR
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2022 Nov; 39(6):463-467. PubMed ID: 35718579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological Aspects of Utilizing Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Adequacy Assessments.
    Mahajan A; Selvaggi S; Pantanowitz L
    J Pathol Inform; 2018; 9():12. PubMed ID: 29721360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.