These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31808432)

  • 1. [Not Available].
    Giulio Formoso, per l'Associazione Alessandro Liberati - Network italiano Cochrane
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):524-525. PubMed ID: 31808432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why do we continue to adopt medical practices based on pathophysiology alone when we should be insisting on clinical trials?
    Prasad V; Ho N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 24581292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study design: statistical and methodologic considerations.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):980-6. PubMed ID: 10152244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninferiority drug trials fail to report adequate methodological detail: an assessment of noninferiority trials from 2010 to 2015.
    Hong J; Tung A; Kinkade A; Tejani AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():144-146. PubMed ID: 30529004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Not Available].
    Buzzetti R
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):531. PubMed ID: 31808436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized trials, observational studies, and the illusive search for the source of truth.
    Gaudino M; Bagiella E; Chang HL; Kurlansky P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 163(2):757-762. PubMed ID: 33277031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pros and cons of pragmatic clinical trials.
    Lurie JD; Morgan TS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24236521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Pragmatic randomized controlled trials as a source of data in the assessment of effectiveness of medical technology].
    Kaczyński L; Solnica B
    Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 23401993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures? Against.
    Valk PE
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jan; 31(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 14652698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures? For.
    Van Tinteren H; Hoekstra OS; Boers M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jan; 31(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 14647984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a difference between applicability and generalisability?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():A5-A7. PubMed ID: 32130940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jumping in before the water is hot: the need to support randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Epstein AE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):867-9. PubMed ID: 15333076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The limitations of observation studies for decision making regarding drugs efficacy and safety.
    Gueyffier F; Cucherat M
    Therapie; 2019 Apr; 74(2):181-185. PubMed ID: 30514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Not Available].
    Banzi R
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):526-527. PubMed ID: 31808433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of real-world data in cancer drug development.
    Skovlund E; Leufkens HGM; Smyth JF
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Sep; 101():69-76. PubMed ID: 30031168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The play of chance.
    Collins J
    Fertil Steril; 2006 May; 85(5):1364-7; discussion 1368-70. PubMed ID: 16600221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Not Available].
    Messori A
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):533. PubMed ID: 31808438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.