BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31809350)

  • 1. Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques.
    Guo Y; Hou X; Rokohl AC; Jia R; Heindl LM
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):e23-e31. PubMed ID: 31809350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Simple Standardized Three-Dimensional Anthropometry for the Periocular Region in a European Population.
    Guo Y; Schaub F; Mor JM; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 145(3):514e-523e. PubMed ID: 32097302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocol Establishment and Reliability Verification of Three-Dimensional Digital Stereophotogrammetry in Lower Eyelid Anthropometry.
    Chi Y; Yang Y; Jin L; Chong Y; Huang J; Yu N; Long X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Apr; 48(7):1276-1287. PubMed ID: 37792022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Facial Anthropometry Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry and Direct Measuring Techniques.
    Düppe K; Becker M; Schönmeyr B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29608484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometric Evaluation of Periorbital Region and Facial Projection Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry.
    Jodeh DS; Curtis H; Cray JJ; Ford J; Decker S; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2017-2020. PubMed ID: 30277938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of Stereophotogrammetry for Area Measurement in the Periocular Region.
    Liu J; Rokohl AC; Guo Y; Li S; Hou X; Fan W; Formuzal M; Lin M; Heindl LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1601-1610. PubMed ID: 33452540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Perioral Evaluation Method Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry.
    Yang Y; Chi Y; Jin L; Chong Y; Long X; Zeng A; Yu N; Wang X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2389-2400. PubMed ID: 37430012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
    Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring digit lengths with 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A comparison across methods.
    Gremba A; Weinberg SM
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jul; 30(4):e23133. PubMed ID: 29744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Portable Next-Generation VECTRA H2 3D Imaging System for Periocular Anthropometry.
    Fan W; Guo Y; Hou X; Liu J; Li S; Ju S; Matos PAW; Simon M; Rokohl AC; Heindl LM
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():833487. PubMed ID: 35360740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of three-dimensional stereo-photogrammetry (3dMD™) in anthropometry of the auricle and its application in microtia reconstruction.
    Chen ZC; Albdour MN; Lizardo JA; Chen YA; Chen PK
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 25892285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anthropometric Study of Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Malay Adults.
    Othman SA; Majawit LP; Wan Hassan WN; Wey MC; Mohd Razi R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164180. PubMed ID: 27706220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Heike CL; Cunningham ML; Hing AV; Stuhaug E; Starr JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 19935311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
    Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.