These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31809350)

  • 21. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
    Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems.
    Ye H; Lv L; Liu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27148978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging.
    Camison L; Bykowski M; Lee WW; Carlson JC; Roosenboom J; Goldstein JA; Losee JE; Weinberg SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 47(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 28919165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement.
    Lim YC; Abdul Shakor AS; Shaharudin R
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():813058. PubMed ID: 35155360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a three-dimensional hand model using 3D stereophotogrammetry: Evaluation of landmark reproducibility.
    Hoevenaren IA; Maal TJ; Krikken E; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):709-16. PubMed ID: 25665488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital 2D-photogrammetry and direct anthropometry--a comparing study on test accomplishment and measurement data.
    Franke-Gromberg C; Schüler G; Hermanussen M; Scheffler C
    Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 20954452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Periocular Asymmetry Index in Caucasian Populations Using Three-dimensional Photogrammetry Assessment.
    Ju X; Rokohl AC; Fan W; Simon M; Li X; Hou X; Ukehajdaraj N; Wawer Matos PA; Guo Y; Heindl LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38806825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of Areal Measurement in the Periocular Region Using Stereophotogrammetry.
    Liu J; Guo Y; Arakelyan M; Rokohl AC; Heindl LM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 79(5):1106.e1-1106.e9. PubMed ID: 33434522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
    Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research.
    Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
    Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry.
    Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Poppa P; Cummaudo M; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1807-1813. PubMed ID: 30097408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of an automated method of 3D soft tissue landmark detection.
    Baksi S; Freezer S; Matsumoto T; Dreyer C
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):622-630. PubMed ID: 33377968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
    Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: Comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas's North American norms.
    Weinberg SM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 May; 155(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 31053285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of a low-cost laser scanner device for the assessment of three-dimensional facial anatomy in living subjects.
    Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Caplova Z; Cappella A; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 30196857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of Novel Soft-Tissue Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Human Facial Scan Images in Caucasian and Asian.
    Li Z; Giunta RE; Frank K; Schenck TL; Koban KC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):719-731. PubMed ID: 34704125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.