BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31809468)

  • 21. Machine learning analyses can differentiate meningioma grade by features on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hale AT; Stonko DP; Wang L; Strother MK; Chambless LB
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E4. PubMed ID: 30453458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images.
    Banzato T; Bernardini M; Cherubini GB; Zotti A
    BMC Vet Res; 2018 Oct; 14(1):317. PubMed ID: 30348148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of deep learning for differentiating pancreatic diseases on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary study.
    Gao X; Wang X
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 31375430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficiency Improvement in a Busy Radiology Practice: Determination of Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol Using Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Lee YH
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):604-610. PubMed ID: 29619578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicenter Study of the Utility of Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer Models for the Detection and Segmentation of Meningiomas.
    Ma X; Zhao L; Dang S; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Li X; Li P; Chen Y; Mei N; Yin B; Geng D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2024 May-Jun 01; 48(3):480-490. PubMed ID: 38013244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of DWI and QSI for differentiating between meningioma and schwannoma: a pilot study.
    Nagano H; Sakai K; Tazoe J; Yasuike M; Akazawa K; Yamada K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 31396824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deep-learning approach with convolutional neural network for classification of maximum intensity projections of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Fujioka T; Yashima Y; Oyama J; Mori M; Kubota K; Katsuta L; Kimura K; Yamaga E; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Kitazume Y; Tateishi U
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 75():1-8. PubMed ID: 33045323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in distinguishing between spinal meningiomas and schwannomas.
    Hung ND; Dung LT; Huyen DK; Duy NQ; He DV; Duc NM
    Int J Med Sci; 2022; 19(7):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 35919813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of meningioma from multiparametric MRI for preoperative meningioma differentiation using radiomic features: a multicentre study.
    Chen H; Li S; Zhang Y; Liu L; Lv X; Yi Y; Ruan G; Ke C; Feng Y
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):7248-7259. PubMed ID: 35420299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for estimation of the characterisation of coronary plaques: Validation using IB-IVUS.
    Masuda T; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Oda S; Okimoto T; Sato T; Noda N; Yoshiura T; Baba Y; Arao S; Hiratsuka J; Awai K
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34404578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated Detection of Spinal Schwannomas Utilizing Deep Learning Based on Object Detection From Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Ito S; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Nakashima H; Oda M; Machino M; Kanbara S; Inoue T; Yamaguchi H; Koshimizu H; Mori K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 33079909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI.
    Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Yang K; Makmur A; Algazwi DAR; Thian YL; Lau S; Choo YS; Eide SE; Yap QV; Chan YH; Tan JH; Kumar N; Ooi BC; Yoshioka H; Quek ST
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 33973835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Principal component analysis of texture features for grading of meningioma: not effective from the peritumoral area but effective from the tumor area.
    Mori N; Mugikura S; Endo T; Endo H; Oguma Y; Li L; Ito A; Watanabe M; Kanamori M; Tominaga T; Takase K
    Neuroradiology; 2023 Feb; 65(2):257-274. PubMed ID: 36044063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network.
    Aldoj N; Lukas S; Dewey M; Penzkofer T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31468158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated Meningioma Segmentation in Multiparametric MRI : Comparable Effectiveness of a Deep Learning Model and Manual Segmentation.
    Laukamp KR; Pennig L; Thiele F; Reimer R; Görtz L; Shakirin G; Zopfs D; Timmer M; Perkuhn M; Borggrefe J
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 31(2):357-366. PubMed ID: 32060575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinction between benign and malignant breast masses at breast ultrasound using deep learning method with convolutional neural network.
    Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):466-472. PubMed ID: 30888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnosing Ovarian Cancer on MRI: A Preliminary Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiologist Assessments.
    Saida T; Mori K; Hoshiai S; Sakai M; Urushibara A; Ishiguro T; Minami M; Satoh T; Nakajima T
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Feb; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 35205735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intracranial meningioma surveillance using volumetrics from T2-weighted MRI.
    Raban D; Patel SH; Honce JM; Rubinstein D; DeWitt PE; Timpone VM
    J Neuroimaging; 2022 Jan; 32(1):134-140. PubMed ID: 34506680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meningioma Consistency Can Be Defined by Combining the Radiomic Features of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Elastography. A Pilot Study Using Machine Learning Classifiers.
    Cepeda S; Arrese I; García-García S; Velasco-Casares M; Escudero-Caro T; Zamora T; Sarabia R
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1147-e1159. PubMed ID: 33259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Presurgical differentiation between malignant haemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma by a radiomics approach based on texture analysis.
    Li X; Lu Y; Xiong J; Wang D; She D; Kuai X; Geng D; Yin B
    J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 46(5):281-287. PubMed ID: 31226327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.