BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3180951)

  • 1. How reproducible are flow cytometry data from paraffin-embedded blocks?
    Kute TE; Gregory B; Galleshaw J; Hopkins M; Buss D; Case D
    Cytometry; 1988 Sep; 9(5):494-8. PubMed ID: 3180951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
    Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
    Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow cytometric analysis of head and neck carcinoma DNA index and S-fraction from paraffin-embedded sections: comparison with malignancy grading.
    Johnson TS; Williamson KD; Cramer MM; Peters LJ
    Cytometry; 1985 Sep; 6(5):461-70. PubMed ID: 4042786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ploidy and proliferative activity of human gastric carcinoma: a cytofluorometric study on fresh and on paraffin embedded material.
    Danova M; Mazzini G; Wilson G; Ucci G; Dionigi P; Riccardi A; Fiocca R
    Basic Appl Histochem; 1987; 31(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 3593174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
    Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA cytofluorometry in micro-dissected paraffin embedded breast tissue: description of a method.
    Foschini MP; Ceccarelli C; Chieco P; Lisignoli G; Eusebi V
    Basic Appl Histochem; 1987; 31(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 3442555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical and statistical improvements for flow cytometric DNA analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue.
    Sickle-Santanello BJ; Farrar WB; DeCenzo JF; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Klein J; Pearl D; Laufman H; O'Toole RV
    Cytometry; 1988 Nov; 9(6):594-9. PubMed ID: 3208624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity.
    Kallioniemi OP
    Cytometry; 1988 Mar; 9(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 3359893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AgNORs in ductal breast cancer: correlation with ploidy and S-phase fraction by DNA flow cytometry.
    Borgiani L; Cogorno P; Oliviero J; Toso F; Gambini G; Tunesi G; Canepa M
    Eur J Histochem; 1994; 38(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 7524814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow cytometry in node-positive breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B protocol 8869.
    Kute TE; Quadri Y; Muss H; Zbieranski N; Cirrincione C; Berry DA; Barcos M; Thor AP; Liu E; Koerner F
    Cytometry; 1995 Dec; 22(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 8749780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1.
    Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Her2/neu analysis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and multiparameter DNA flow cytometry.
    Leers MP; Hoop JG; Nap M
    Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2A):999-1006. PubMed ID: 12820338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation.
    Danque PO; Chen HB; Patil J; Jagirdar J; Orsatti G; Paronetto F
    Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors that influence the measurement of prostate cancer DNA ploidy and proliferation in paraffin embedded tissue evaluated by flow cytometry.
    So MJ; Cheville JC; Katzmann JA; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Sebo TJ
    Mod Pathol; 2001 Sep; 14(9):906-12. PubMed ID: 11557788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA image cytometry of prostatic carcinoma: a comparison of needle core biopsy and subsequent prostatectomy specimens.
    Leung CS; Zbieranowski I; Demers J; Murray D
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Feb; 7(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 8008743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ploidy, proliferative activity and estrogen receptor content in human breast cancer.
    Raber MN; Barlogie B; Latreille J; Bedrossian C; Fritsche H; Blumenschein G
    Cytometry; 1982 Jul; 3(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 7117052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA flow cytometry of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue using cytokeratin staining.
    Frei JV; Martinez VJ
    Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 7504260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA content in renal cell carcinoma. A clinical study with special reference to tumor heterogeneity and prognosis.
    Ljungberg B
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1986; 100():1-47. PubMed ID: 3472340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative flow cytometric DNA analysis on fresh and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue in different neoplasms.
    Niezabitowski A; Lackowska B; Ryś J; Dyba T; Gruchała A; Szklarski W; Stelmach A; Kruczak A; Swiatkiewicz I
    Pol J Pathol; 1994; 45(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 7953437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proliferative cell indices measured by DNA flow cytometry in node-negative adenocarcinomas of breast: accuracy and significance in cytokeratin-stained archival specimens.
    Frei JV; Rizkalla K; Martinez VJ
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):925-9. PubMed ID: 7534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.