115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31809752)
1. Evaluation of the Functional Mobility Assessment Through Rasch Analysis.
Faieta JM; Hand BN; Berner T; Schmeler MR; DiGiovine C
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 101(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 31809752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study.
Kumar A; Schmeler MR; Karmarkar AM; Collins DM; Cooper R; Cooper RA; Shin H; Holm MB
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 May; 8(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 22612721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment.
Schein RM; Yang A; McKernan GP; Mesoros M; Pramana G; Schmeler MR; Dicianno BE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 102(10):1895-1901. PubMed ID: 33891909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rasch Analyses of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for Power Wheelchair Users.
Sakakibara BM; Miller WC; Rushton PW; Polgar JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 28964794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensionality and Item-Difficulty Hierarchy of the Lower Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Individuals With Subacute and Chronic Stroke.
Balasubramanian CK; Li CY; Bowden MG; Duncan PW; Kautz SA; Velozo CA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 97(4):582-589.e2. PubMed ID: 26740065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptation of the adult Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) into a FMA-Family Centred (FMA-FC) paediatric version.
Beavers DB; Holm MB; Rogers JC; Plummer T; Schmeler M
Child Care Health Dev; 2018 Jul; 44(4):630-635. PubMed ID: 29761533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rasch analyses of the wheelchair use confidence scale.
Sakakibara BM; Miller WC; Rushton PW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 96(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 25461823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills.
Paulisso DC; Schmeler MR; Schein RM; Allegretti ALC; Campos LCB; Costa JD; Fachin-Martins E; Cruz DMCD
Assist Technol; 2021 Sep; 33(5):264-270. PubMed ID: 31207193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common reasons for non-participation during the outcome measurement process: wheeled mobility service delivery quality improvement reporting.
Stojkov AD; Schein RM; Berner T; Beauregard T; DiGiovine CP
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1210-1216. PubMed ID: 36571215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Work environments of people with mobility impairments and limitations: Mobility Device User Work Survey (MWS).
Morgan KA; Gottlieb M; Hollingsworth HH; Gray DB
Work; 2014; 48(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 24284680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Service Delivery Effectiveness Through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Faieta J; Schmeler MR; Schiappa VJ; Hand BN; Schein RM; Saptono A; Berner T; DiGiovine CP
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1072-1078. PubMed ID: 31205061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.
Auger C; Demers L; Gélinas I; Routhier F; Mortenson WB; Miller WC
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jun; 42(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 20549163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability, convergent validity and applicability of the Assistive Technology Outcome Profile for Mobility for middle-aged and older power wheelchair users.
Auger C; Rushton PW; Jutai JW; Miller WC
Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Oct; 65(5):439-448. PubMed ID: 30178483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobility Device Quality Affects Participation Outcomes for People With Disabilities: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.
Magasi S; Wong A; Miskovic A; Tulsky D; Heinemann AW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28784356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring Access to Information and Technology: Environmental Factors Affecting Persons With Neurologic Disorders.
Hahn EA; Garcia SF; Lai JS; Miskovic A; Jerousek S; Semik P; Wong A; Heinemann AW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 97(8):1284-94. PubMed ID: 26903144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement properties of the late life disability index among individuals who use power wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility.
Mortenson WB; Miller WC; Polgar JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Oct; 95(10):1918-24. PubMed ID: 24914820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Internal Construct Validity and Unidimensionality of the Brachial Assessment Tool, A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Brachial Plexus Injury.
Hill B; Pallant J; Williams G; Olver J; Ferris S; Bialocerkowski A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 97(12):2146-2156. PubMed ID: 27478002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study.
Franchignoni F; Godi M; Guglielmetti S; Nardone A; Giordano A
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 25653078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploratory Validation of a Multidimensional Power Wheelchair Outcomes Toolkit.
Mortenson WB; Demers L; Rushton PW; Auger C; Routhier F; Miller WC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Dec; 96(12):2184-93. PubMed ID: 26403685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
