These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31809848)
1. Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study. Munkholm K; Faurholt-Jepsen M; Ioannidis JPA; Hemkens LG J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():75-84. PubMed ID: 31809848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confounding. Hemkens LG; Ewald H; Naudet F; Ladanie A; Shaw JG; Sajeev G; Ioannidis JPA J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():94-102. PubMed ID: 28943377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confounding and bias in observational studies in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-epidemiological study. Piovani D; Pansieri C; Peyrin-Biroulet L; Danese S; Bonovas S Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2021 Mar; 53(6):712-721. PubMed ID: 33296517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review. Groenwold RH; Van Deursen AM; Hoes AW; Hak E Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 18(10):746-51. PubMed ID: 18693038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others. Nieminen P; Rucker G; Miettunen J; Carpenter J; Schumacher M J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):939-46. PubMed ID: 17689810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The STROBE statement and neuropsychology: lighting the way toward evidence-based practice. Loring DW; Bowden SC Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(4):556-74. PubMed ID: 23356727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Author Gender With Sex Bias in Surgical Research. Xiao N; Mansukhani NA; Mendes de Oliveira DF; Kibbe MR JAMA Surg; 2018 Jul; 153(7):663-670. PubMed ID: 29590329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of confounding in epidemiologic studies assessing alcohol consumption on the risk of ischemic heart disease. Wallach JD; Serghiou S; Chu L; Egilman AC; Vasiliou V; Ross JS; Ioannidis JPA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32171256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consideration of confounding in epidemiologic studies assessing alcohol consumption on the risk of breast cancer: A brief report. Chu L; Wallach JD Chem Biol Interact; 2020 May; 322():109060. PubMed ID: 32171849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reporting of categorised quantitative variables in observational epidemiological studies. Mabikwa OV; Greenwood DC; Baxter PD; Fleming SJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Mar; 17(1):201. PubMed ID: 28288628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study. Nguyen VT; Engleton M; Davison M; Ravaud P; Porcher R; Boutron I BMC Med; 2021 Nov; 19(1):279. PubMed ID: 34809637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of observational research reports published in Turkish nursing journals. Karaçam Z; Şen E; Yildirim B Int Nurs Rev; 2015 Sep; 62(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 25801366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer. Almasi-Hashiani A; Nedjat S; Mansournia MA Arch Iran Med; 2018 Apr; 21(4):164-169. PubMed ID: 29693407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reporting quality of meta-epidemiological studies needs substantial improvement: a research on research study. Long Y; Zheng Y; Wang X; Guo Q; Zhang N; Deng Y; Tang R; Li Z; Du L Syst Rev; 2024 Sep; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 39342302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. Tatsioni A; Bonitsis NG; Ioannidis JP JAMA; 2007 Dec; 298(21):2517-26. PubMed ID: 18056905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline. Pouwels KB; Widyakusuma NN; Groenwold RH; Hak E J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():217-24. PubMed ID: 26327488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of reporting quality for observational studies using routinely collected health data in pharmacovigilance. Nie X; Zhang Y; Wu Z; Jia L; Wang X; Langan SM; Benchimol EI; Peng X Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2018 Jul; 17(7):661-668. PubMed ID: 29857774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study. Aghazadeh-Attari J; Mobaraki K; Ahmadzadeh J; Mansorian B; Mohebbi I BMC Res Notes; 2018 May; 11(1):266. PubMed ID: 29720270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of reporting and risk of bias in therapeutic otolaryngology publications. Kaper NM; Swart KMA; Grolman W; Van Der Heijden GJMG J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jan; 132(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29231150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]