These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31810614)

  • 1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Sezer T; Kilic K; Esim E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 35904827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gürbüz A; Güçlü ZB; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Aug; 67(4):307-315. PubMed ID: 35587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.
    Wu D; Tian K; Chen J; Jin H; Huang W; Liu Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():560645. PubMed ID: 25802549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of narrow dental implants.
    Valera-Jiménez JF; Burgueño-Barris G; Gómez-González S; López-López J; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Fernández-Aguado E
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):927-935. PubMed ID: 32466868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
    Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Splinting of Tilted External Hexagon Implants on 3-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Rosa CDDRD; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):697-704. PubMed ID: 34859540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure.
    Zincir ÖÖ; Parlar A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):646. PubMed ID: 34915864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FEA of Peri-Implant Stresses in Fixed Partial Denture Prostheses with Cantilevers.
    Alencar SM; Nogueira LB; Leal de Moura W; Rubo JH; Saymo de Oliveira Silva T; Martins GA; Moura CD
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 26588042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Yilmaz O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):563-570. PubMed ID: 35727249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Borie E; Leal E; Orsi IA; Salamanca C; Dias FJ; Weber B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 29318899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.