These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31810722)

  • 1. Blood Flow Pattern Analysis for Carotid Plaque Evaluation.
    Shimonaga K; Matsushige T; Sakamoto S; Takahashi H; Hashimoto Y; Mizoue T; Ono C; Kurisu K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Feb; 29(2):104539. PubMed ID: 31810722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Intraplaque Neovascularization Using Superb Microvascular Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography.
    Oura K; Kato T; Ohba H; Terayama Y
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2348-2353. PubMed ID: 29754774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of automatic measurement of contrast flow intensity: an innovative tool in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization. A pilot study.
    Lisowska A; Knapp M; Tycinska A; Sawicki R; Kralisz P; Lisowski P; Sobkowicz B; Musial WI
    Int Angiol; 2014 Feb; 33(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24452086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Cattaneo M; Sun J; Staub D; Xu D; Gallino JM; Santini P; Porretta AP; Yuan C; Balu N; Arnold M; Froio A; Limoni C; Wyttenbach R; Gallino A
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2019; 48(3-6):140-148. PubMed ID: 31661690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case Report: Evaluating Biomechanical Risk Factors in Carotid Stenosis by Patient-Specific Fluid-Structural Interaction Biomechanical Analysis.
    Wang J; Mendieta JB; Paritala PK; Xiang Y; Raffel OC; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021; 50(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 33744885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron-oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI with ferumoxytol to quantify arterial wall inflammation.
    Smits LP; Tiessens F; Zheng KH; Stroes ES; Nederveen AJ; Coolen BF
    Atherosclerosis; 2017 Aug; 263():211-218. PubMed ID: 28662398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary study of hemodynamic distribution in patient-specific stenotic carotid bifurcation by image-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Xue YJ; Gao PY; Duan Q; Lin Y; Dai CB
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):558-65. PubMed ID: 18568543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
    Brinjikji W; Huston J; Rabinstein AA; Kim GM; Lerman A; Lanzino G
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 124(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 26230478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Time-Dependent Changes and the Vulnerability of Carotid Plaques Using Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Ultrasonography.
    Shimada H; Ogata T; Takano K; Abe H; Higashi T; Yamashita T; Matsunaga A; Inoue T
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Feb; 27(2):321-325. PubMed ID: 29030047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Wang Z; Lu M; Liu W; Zheng T; Li D; Yu W; Fan Z
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Mar; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 32131854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 as a Possible Biomarker of Plaque Instability in Carotid Artery Stenosis.
    Shimonaga K; Matsushige T; Takahashi H; Hashimoto Y; Yoshiyama M; Ono C; Sakamoto S
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Jul; 30(7):105816. PubMed ID: 33906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound as a diagnostic alternative for morphological characterization of carotid plaque: comparison with histology and high-resolution magnetic resonance findings.
    Chiocchi M; Chiaravalloti A; Morosetti D; Loreni G; Gandini R; Mancino S; Fabiano S; Simonetti G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2019 May; 20(5):335-342. PubMed ID: 30925146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Carotid Plaque Contrast Enhancement on MRI Predictive for Cerebral or Cardiovascular Events? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Papini GD; Di Leo G; Bandirali M; Cotticelli B; Flor N; Restivo P; Nano G; Sardanelli F
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 27824664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arterial wall imaging.
    Devuyst G; Piechowski-Józwiak BO; Bogousslavsky J
    Front Neurol Neurosci; 2006; 21():19-26. PubMed ID: 17290123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intracranial collateralization determines hemodynamic forces for carotid plaque disruption.
    Lal BK; Beach KW; Sumner DS
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 54(5):1461-71. PubMed ID: 21820834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peak Systolic Velocity for Calcified Plaques Fails to Estimate Carotid Stenosis Degree.
    Morales MM; Anacleto A; Filho CM; Ledesma S; Aldrovani M; Wolosker N
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Aug; 59():1-4. PubMed ID: 30802575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging to evaluate carotid artery stenosis: comparison with magnetic resonance angiography.
    Igase K; Kumon Y; Matsubara I; Arai M; Goishi J; Watanabe H; Ohnishi T; Sadamoto K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 25440325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in lesion severity and cellular composition between in vivo assessed upstream and downstream sides of human symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques.
    Fagerberg B; Ryndel M; Kjelldahl J; Akyürek LM; Rosengren L; Karlström L; Bergström G; Olson FJ
    J Vasc Res; 2010; 47(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 19893319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.