These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31810788)

  • 21. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.
    Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26738897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes after elective shoulder replacement surgery using data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England: population based cohort study.
    Valsamis EM; Collins GS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Whitehouse MR; Rangan A; Sayers A; Rees JL
    BMJ; 2023 Jun; 381():e075355. PubMed ID: 37343999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgeons' knowledge about the costs of orthopaedic implants.
    Rohman L; Hadi S; Whitwell G
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Aug; 22(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 25163960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national datasets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after knee replacement?
    Smith LK; Garriga C; Kingsbury SR; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Delmestri A; Arden NK; Stone M; Conaghan PG; Judge A
    BMJ Open; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e046900. PubMed ID: 35264336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales and the Isle of Man.
    Lamb JN; Matharu GS; Redmond A; Judge A; West RM; Pandit HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3065-3073.e1. PubMed ID: 31353251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dynamic early identification of hip replacement implants with high revision rates. Study based on the NJR data from UK during 2004-2012.
    Begun A; MacGregor AJ; Pchejetski D; Kulinskaya E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236701. PubMed ID: 32750091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes based on implant brand in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.
    Kahlenberg CA; Lyman S; Joseph AD; Chiu YF; Padgett DE
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):48-54. PubMed ID: 31256639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset.
    Patel A; Pavlou G; Mújica-Mota RE; Toms AD
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Aug; 97-B(8):1076-81. PubMed ID: 26224824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28947370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does early return to theatre add value to rates of revision at 3 years in assessing surgeon performance for elective hip and knee arthroplasty? National observational study.
    Bottle A; Chase HE; Aylin PP; Loeffler M
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 May; 27(5):373-379. PubMed ID: 28765504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 28768778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
    Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of a national enhanced recovery after surgery programme on patient outcomes of primary total knee replacement: an interrupted time series analysis from "The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man".
    Garriga C; Murphy J; Leal J; Price A; Prieto-Alhambra D; Carr A; Arden NK; Rangan A; Cooper C; Peat G; Fitzpatrick R; Barker K; Judge A
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2019 Sep; 27(9):1280-1293. PubMed ID: 31078777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Good outcome of total hip replacement in patients with cerebral palsy: A comparison of 389 patients and 425,813 controls from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    King G; Hunt LP; Wilkinson JM; Blom AW;
    Acta Orthop; 2016; 87(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 26863583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.
    Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Vernon K; Porter M; Blom AW;
    Lancet; 2012 Mar; 379(9822):1199-204. PubMed ID: 22417410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk factors for early revision after total hip and knee arthroplasty: National observational study from a surgeon and population perspective.
    Bottle A; Parikh S; Aylin P; Loeffler M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214855. PubMed ID: 30964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):793-801. PubMed ID: 26033059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
    Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.