129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31811081)
1. Where We are on the Twentieth Anniversary of
Sloan L; Gulrajani C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 31811081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Constitutional Right to Community Services:
Ferleger D
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 32400311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3.
Kershner S; Goico SW
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 32400312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating the disabled into the community in the wake of Olmstead.
Priaulx E
Caring; 2003 Sep; 22(9):6-10. PubMed ID: 14618898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy.
Rosenbaum S
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Aug; 41(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 27127257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Americans with Disabilities Act at 25: the highest expression of American values.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(22):2231-5. PubMed ID: 26057283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking Choice Seriously in
Bagenstos SR
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 32400314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CRIPA, Olmstead, and the transformation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 22960921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Realizing the Promise of
Schwartz SJ; Fleischner RD; Schwartz AZ; Stephens EM
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):63-100. PubMed ID: 32400309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judicial Threats to
Mangan JG; Dennis AL
Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jun; 75(6):589-593. PubMed ID: 38088039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court to rule on rights of people with disabilities.
Gold S
Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 10539554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Americans With Disabilities Act and community-based treatment law.
Petrila J
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Apr; 50(4):473-4, 480. PubMed ID: 10211724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Where the action really is: Medicaid and the disabled.
Vladeck BC
Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 12528841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving ahead with Olmstead: to comply with the American with Disabilities Act, states are working hard to find community placements for people with disabilities.
Donlin JM
State Legis; 2003 Mar; 29(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 15252945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme court agrees to define employer.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2003; 14(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 12532074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ADA and the Supreme Court: a mixed record.
Bagenstos SR
JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(22):2217-8. PubMed ID: 26057276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
Yong F
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the number of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities living in u.s. Nursing facilities between 1988 and 2007.
Scott N; Larson SA; Lakin KC
Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Jun; 47(3):242-5. PubMed ID: 19489669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prohibition on assisting a suicide is interference with rights of severely disabled people, UK Supreme Court is told.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7589. PubMed ID: 24352939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
